Biggest population changes in Kamjong district
Computed from 100 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Kamjong district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tusom | 271 | 531 | +95.9% |
| 2 | Sorde | 265 | 510 | +92.5% |
| 3 | Phungyar | 953 | 1,830 | +92.0% |
| 4 | Bungpun | 106 | 202 | +90.6% |
| 5 | Chakama | 162 | 301 | +85.8% |
| 6 | Kangpat Khullen | 353 | 645 | +82.7% |
| 7 | Louphong | 266 | 477 | +79.3% |
| 8 | Shingta | 322 | 577 | +79.2% |
| 9 | Khongle | 270 | 463 | +71.5% |
| 10 | Shakok | 226 | 382 | +69.0% |
| 11 | Khoiripok | 247 | 410 | +66.0% |
| 12 | Marou | 309 | 507 | +64.1% |
| 13 | Patbung | 191 | 308 | +61.3% |
| 14 | Riha(T) | 1,087 | 1,742 | +60.3% |
| 15 | Lamlai Khunou | 524 | 830 | +58.4% |
| 16 | T. Hundung Khunou | 224 | 353 | +57.6% |
| 17 | Chungkai | 266 | 416 | +56.4% |
| 18 | Chassad | 729 | 1,120 | +53.6% |
| 19 | Thawai(T) | 1,159 | 1,750 | +51.0% |
| 20 | H. Goda | 336 | 504 | +50.0% |
Villages that shrank most in Kamjong district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sampui | 343 | 215 | -37.3% |
| 2 | Chingshou | 211 | 138 | -34.6% |
| 3 | Sikibung | 1,084 | 715 | -34.0% |
| 4 | Shangpunram | 196 | 135 | -31.1% |
| 5 | Meiti | 108 | 79 | -26.9% |
| 6 | Shingcha | 474 | 350 | -26.2% |
| 7 | K. Ashang Khullen | 205 | 164 | -20.0% |
| 8 | Chatric | 854 | 684 | -19.9% |
| 9 | Thawai(K) | 336 | 272 | -19.1% |
| 10 | Molvailup | 386 | 320 | -17.1% |
| 11 | Kashung | 474 | 401 | -15.4% |
| 12 | Matiyang | 152 | 132 | -13.2% |
| 13 | Yentem | 152 | 132 | -13.2% |
| 14 | Tarong | 338 | 295 | -12.7% |
| 15 | K.Leihaoram | 769 | 680 | -11.6% |
| 16 | Phaimol | 160 | 147 | -8.1% |
| 17 | Hangkou | 312 | 297 | -4.8% |
| 18 | Yeasem | 253 | 245 | -3.2% |
| 19 | Chahong Khullen | 545 | 536 | -1.6% |
| 20 | Itham | 240 | 239 | -0.4% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
2 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
2 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.