GaonData

Biggest population changes in Tengnoupal district

Computed from 129 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Tengnoupal district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Sl. Zoungam Machi 119 285 +139.5%
2 Pelyang Machi 111 250 +125.2%
3 Kambang Khullen Tengnoupal 237 515 +117.3%
4 S.D.Munjang Tengnoupal 145 315 +117.2%
5 S.Moljol Moreh 192 413 +115.1%
6 Khunbi Tuisen Machi 203 430 +111.8%
7 Khudei Khuman Machi 142 285 +100.7%
8 Choktong Tengnoupal 121 242 +100.0%
9 Khulsaibung(Karongthel) Machi 948 1,895 +99.9%
10 Salemphai Machi 126 233 +84.9%
11 Lamlong Khullen Machi 902 1,599 +77.3%
12 Maojang Moreh 212 360 +69.8%
13 Sairel Machi 104 175 +68.3%
14 Gomi Machi 102 170 +66.7%
15 Konaitong Machi 316 526 +66.5%
16 Phalbung Tengnoupal 344 570 +65.7%
17 Kanankhuren Tengnoupal 122 199 +63.1%
18 N. Champhai Moreh 145 235 +62.1%
19 Govajang Moreh 123 198 +61.0%
20 Yangoupokpi Moreh 137 220 +60.6%

Villages that shrank most in Tengnoupal district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Tengnoupal Tengnoupal 2,158 1,366 -36.7%
2 Theimungkung Tengnoupal 266 173 -35.0%
3 Leithao Machi 120 79 -34.2%
4 Teraphai Tengnoupal 249 170 -31.7%
5 K .Zalenmoul Moreh 139 102 -26.6%
6 Damjol Tengnoupal 254 189 -25.6%
7 Aigijang Tengnoupal 108 81 -25.0%
8 Kulyang Machi 136 105 -22.8%
9 H.Mongjang Moreh 318 247 -22.3%
10 Langol Machi 1,169 948 -18.9%
11 Angbrasu Tengnoupal 351 301 -14.3%
12 Phaichambung Tengnoupal 191 170 -11.0%
13 Biyang Machi 156 140 -10.3%
14 Island Tengnoupal 256 230 -10.2%
15 New Shijang Moreh 166 150 -9.6%
16 Sita Tengnoupal 755 687 -9.0%
17 Khudei Khullen Tengnoupal 371 350 -5.7%
18 P.S.Kananyao Machi 111 105 -5.4%
19 B.Bongjang Moreh 157 150 -4.5%
20 Nungtak Machi 157 152 -3.2%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 18 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 18 excluded in total. How the limits are set.