Biggest population changes in Thoubal district
Computed from 44 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Thoubal district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Irong Thokchom | 645 | 1,600 | +148.1% |
| 2 | Cherapur | 3,193 | 6,750 | +111.4% |
| 3 | Heirok Chingdompok | 1,146 | 2,398 | +109.3% |
| 4 | Thoubal Khunou | 179 | 360 | +101.1% |
| 5 | Hayel Labuk | 1,758 | 3,450 | +96.3% |
| 6 | Lourembam | 1,050 | 1,567 | +49.2% |
| 7 | Phundrei | 3,087 | 4,603 | +49.1% |
| 8 | Khongjom | 2,334 | 3,305 | +41.6% |
| 9 | Kairembikhok | 1,779 | 2,500 | +40.5% |
| 10 | Phanjangkhong | 235 | 328 | +39.6% |
| 11 | Leisangthem | 6,118 | 8,168 | +33.5% |
| 12 | Kangyambem | 3,090 | 4,093 | +32.5% |
| 13 | Nungei | 2,074 | 2,746 | +32.4% |
| 14 | Atoukhong | 1,611 | 2,130 | +32.2% |
| 15 | Moijing | 7,428 | 9,688 | +30.4% |
| 16 | Laiphrakpam | 1,093 | 1,425 | +30.4% |
| 17 | Thokchom | 697 | 890 | +27.7% |
| 18 | Khoirom | 4,037 | 5,100 | +26.3% |
| 19 | Ningel | 338 | 424 | +25.4% |
| 20 | Pechi | 830 | 1,033 | +24.5% |
Villages that shrank most in Thoubal district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Khekman | 7,157 | 5,226 | -27.0% |
| 2 | Chandrakhong | 1,162 | 930 | -20.0% |
| 3 | Charangpat Maklang | 3,535 | 3,234 | -8.5% |
| 4 | Charangpat | 2,834 | 2,840 | +0.2% |
| 5 | Wangkhem | 5,235 | 5,338 | +2.0% |
| 6 | Tentha | 9,087 | 9,332 | +2.7% |
| 7 | Leirongthel | 2,038 | 2,124 | +4.2% |
| 8 | Sangaiyumpham | 11,311 | 11,876 | +5.0% |
| 9 | Kakmayai | 657 | 725 | +10.3% |
| 10 | Wangbal | 2,420 | 2,690 | +11.2% |
| 11 | Oinam | 2,377 | 2,672 | +12.4% |
| 12 | Heirok Part I I (Pt) | 6,205 | 7,225 | +16.4% |
| 13 | Chingtham | 1,391 | 1,642 | +18.0% |
| 14 | Langmeithel | 931 | 1,119 | +20.2% |
| 15 | Icham Kunou | 664 | 800 | +20.5% |
| 16 | Kangthokchao | 2,162 | 2,605 | +20.5% |
| 17 | Ingourok | 593 | 717 | +20.9% |
| 18 | Uyal | 1,267 | 1,540 | +21.6% |
| 19 | Langathel | 4,742 | 5,784 | +22.0% |
| 20 | Papal | 1,133 | 1,386 | +22.3% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
1 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
1 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.