Biggest population changes in Aizawl district
Computed from 54 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Aizawl district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Samtlang | 808 | 1,703 | +110.8% |
| 2 | Thingsat | 154 | 305 | +98.0% |
| 3 | Chhanchhuahna Khawpui | 134 | 260 | +94.0% |
| 4 | East Damdiai | 205 | 370 | +80.5% |
| 5 | Chawilung | 371 | 660 | +77.9% |
| 6 | Lungsum | 413 | 733 | +77.5% |
| 7 | Falkawn | 1,339 | 2,050 | +53.1% |
| 8 | Sunhluchhip | 568 | 855 | +50.5% |
| 9 | North Serzawl | 601 | 896 | +49.1% |
| 10 | Sailutar | 536 | 795 | +48.3% |
| 11 | North Tinghmun | 873 | 1,263 | +44.7% |
| 12 | Vaitin | 1,069 | 1,530 | +43.1% |
| 13 | Sawleng | 1,452 | 2,070 | +42.6% |
| 14 | Upper Sakawrdai | 144 | 202 | +40.3% |
| 15 | Tuirial | 824 | 1,150 | +39.6% |
| 16 | East Phaileng | 1,141 | 1,548 | +35.7% |
| 17 | Lamchhip | 709 | 961 | +35.5% |
| 18 | Kepran | 708 | 950 | +34.2% |
| 19 | Khawruhlian | 2,111 | 2,797 | +32.5% |
| 20 | Pehlawn | 685 | 900 | +31.4% |
Villages that shrank most in Aizawl district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sesawng I | 2,722 | 2,061 | -24.3% |
| 2 | Zohmun | 1,399 | 1,462 | +4.5% |
| 3 | Thingsul Tlangnuam | 1,587 | 1,685 | +6.2% |
| 4 | Darlawng | 653 | 699 | +7.0% |
| 5 | North Khawdungsei | 251 | 269 | +7.2% |
| 6 | Phulmawi | 277 | 298 | +7.6% |
| 7 | Muthi | 907 | 1,000 | +10.3% |
| 8 | Melriat | 997 | 1,114 | +11.7% |
| 9 | Sialsuk | 1,881 | 2,150 | +14.3% |
| 10 | Thiak | 749 | 857 | +14.4% |
| 11 | Nausel | 291 | 334 | +14.8% |
| 12 | Tlungvel | 2,529 | 2,913 | +15.2% |
| 13 | Lungleng I | 791 | 914 | +15.6% |
| 14 | New Vervek | 729 | 850 | +16.6% |
| 15 | Kelsih | 736 | 863 | +17.3% |
| 16 | Hualngohmun | 693 | 831 | +19.9% |
| 17 | Sumsuih | 744 | 893 | +20.0% |
| 18 | Khawpuar | 556 | 670 | +20.5% |
| 19 | Sateek | 859 | 1,040 | +21.1% |
| 20 | Aibawk | 1,325 | 1,607 | +21.3% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
0 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.