GaonData

Biggest population changes in Champhai district

Computed from 41 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Champhai district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Vaikhawtlang Champhai 938 1,400 +49.3%
2 Farkawn Khawbung 2,700 3,842 +42.3%
3 Thekpui Khawbung 320 439 +37.2%
4 Ngur Champhai 1,674 2,293 +37.0%
5 Dilkawn Champhai 842 1,147 +36.2%
6 Zokhawthar Champhai 2,632 3,570 +35.6%
7 Bungzung Khawbung 1,038 1,382 +33.1%
8 Leisenzo Khawbung 796 1,057 +32.8%
9 N.Khawbung Champhai 875 1,134 +29.6%
10 Dungtlang Khawbung 892 1,150 +28.9%
11 Lianpui Khawbung 531 684 +28.8%
12 Kelkang Champhai 1,039 1,329 +27.9%
13 Melbuk Champhai 533 673 +26.3%
14 Khuangleng Khawbung 1,686 2,101 +24.6%
15 Vangchhia Khawbung 837 1,038 +24.0%
16 Selam Champhai 1,017 1,259 +23.8%
17 Bulfekzawl Khawbung 351 429 +22.2%
18 Khankawn Khawbung 638 773 +21.2%
19 Khuangthing Khawbung 1,435 1,720 +19.9%
20 Vaphai Khawbung 2,252 2,675 +18.8%

Villages that shrank most in Champhai district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Samthang (old) Khawbung 908 624 -31.3%
2 Lungphunlian Champhai 384 330 -14.1%
3 Buang Khawbung 480 450 -6.3%
4 Sazep Khawbung 649 624 -3.9%
5 Sesih Khawbung 1,227 1,248 +1.7%
6 Murlen Champhai 510 527 +3.3%
7 Tuipui Champhai 461 478 +3.7%
8 Tualcheng Champhai 770 802 +4.2%
9 Chawngtui East Khawbung 290 307 +5.9%
10 Khawbung South Khawbung 2,097 2,258 +7.7%
11 Zawlsei Khawbung 492 530 +7.7%
12 Hnahlan Champhai 3,157 3,471 +9.9%
13 Hruaikawn Khawbung 395 445 +12.7%
14 Khuangphah Champhai 728 826 +13.5%
15 Leithum Khawbung 546 622 +13.9%
16 Zawngtetui Khawbung 201 229 +13.9%
17 Vanzau Khawbung 657 760 +15.7%
18 Vapar Champhai 891 1,035 +16.2%
19 Mualkawi Champhai 664 774 +16.6%
20 New Hruaikawn Khawbung 178 211 +18.5%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 0 excluded in total. How the limits are set.