Biggest population changes in Mizoram
Computed from 571 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Mizoram
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pangbalkawn | 792 | 1,969 | +148.6% |
| 2 | Chamdur �P� II | 196 | 480 | +144.9% |
| 3 | Kawrthindeng | 654 | 1,520 | +132.4% |
| 4 | Mualthuam | 646 | 1,467 | +127.1% |
| 5 | Boranasury | 189 | 426 | +125.4% |
| 6 | Kananthar | 268 | 600 | +123.9% |
| 7 | Tumpanglui | 307 | 683 | +122.5% |
| 8 | Charluitlang | 108 | 237 | +119.4% |
| 9 | Kamalanagar-I | 1,415 | 3,000 | +112.0% |
| 10 | Samtlang | 808 | 1,703 | +110.8% |
| 11 | Nalzawl | 449 | 934 | +108.0% |
| 12 | Fultuli | 348 | 721 | +107.2% |
| 13 | Mautlang (Lungsen) | 187 | 380 | +103.2% |
| 14 | Rulkual | 406 | 805 | +98.3% |
| 15 | Thingsat | 154 | 305 | +98.0% |
| 16 | Kalapani | 505 | 991 | +96.2% |
| 17 | Chhanchhuahna Khawpui | 134 | 260 | +94.0% |
| 18 | Kolalian | 645 | 1,250 | +93.8% |
| 19 | Tungosora | 149 | 287 | +92.6% |
| 20 | Laitlang | 182 | 350 | +92.3% |
Villages that shrank most in Mizoram
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tuipang V- I | 1,655 | 1,025 | -38.1% |
| 2 | Kawrthah South | 2,812 | 1,767 | -37.2% |
| 3 | Bualpui Ng-II | 1,207 | 771 | -36.1% |
| 4 | Longpuighat | 1,265 | 811 | -35.9% |
| 5 | Baraguisury | 547 | 370 | -32.4% |
| 6 | Samthang (old) | 908 | 624 | -31.3% |
| 7 | Vairawkai | 168 | 118 | -29.8% |
| 8 | Phura-N | 1,068 | 760 | -28.8% |
| 9 | Saikah u | 553 | 403 | -27.1% |
| 10 | CHHUANTHAR TLANGNUAM | 3,220 | 2,370 | -26.4% |
| 11 | Sesawng I | 2,722 | 2,061 | -24.3% |
| 12 | Lungtian I | 1,551 | 1,176 | -24.2% |
| 13 | Tuisih-I | 878 | 668 | -23.9% |
| 14 | Karlui I | 1,226 | 938 | -23.5% |
| 15 | Sihthiang | 1,399 | 1,072 | -23.4% |
| 16 | North Chaltlang - I | 1,053 | 810 | -23.1% |
| 17 | Bungtlang S-I | 2,186 | 1,703 | -22.1% |
| 18 | Lungpuitlang | 221 | 177 | -19.9% |
| 19 | Saihapui V | 368 | 295 | -19.8% |
| 20 | Nunsury - I | 1,263 | 1,019 | -19.3% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
3 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
3 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.