GaonData

Biggest population changes in Khawzawl district

Computed from 25 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Khawzawl district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Vanchengpui Khawzawl 754 1,082 +43.5%
2 Rabung Khawzawl 1,528 2,067 +35.3%
3 New Chalrang Khawzawl 550 735 +33.6%
4 Ngaizawl Khawzawl 797 1,040 +30.5%
5 Neihdawn Khawzawl 607 760 +25.2%
6 Tlangpui Khawzawl 846 1,047 +23.8%
7 Pamchung Khawzawl 303 372 +22.8%
8 Chalrang Khawzawl 696 810 +16.4%
9 Khualen Khawzawl 239 275 +15.1%
10 Chhawrtui Khawzawl 1,011 1,153 +14.1%
11 Chawngtlai Khawzawl 1,638 1,829 +11.7%
12 Puilo Khawzawl 474 528 +11.4%
13 Arro Khawzawl 156 171 +9.6%
14 Tualpui Khawzawl 589 644 +9.3%
15 Vankal Khawzawl 326 356 +9.2%
16 Dulte Khawzawl 908 975 +7.4%
17 Tualte Khawzawl 1,177 1,263 +7.3%
18 Sialhawk Khawzawl 2,279 2,440 +7.1%
19 Tlangmawi Khawzawl 257 273 +6.2%
20 Hmuncheng Khawzawl 347 367 +5.8%

Villages that shrank most in Khawzawl district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Kawlkulh South Khawzawl 3,094 2,537 -18.0%
2 Aiduzawl Khawzawl 326 321 -1.5%
3 Vangtlang Khawzawl 521 527 +1.1%
4 Riangtlei Khawzawl 505 514 +1.8%
5 Lungtan Khawzawl 658 678 +3.0%
6 Hmuncheng Khawzawl 347 367 +5.8%
7 Tlangmawi Khawzawl 257 273 +6.2%
8 Sialhawk Khawzawl 2,279 2,440 +7.1%
9 Tualte Khawzawl 1,177 1,263 +7.3%
10 Dulte Khawzawl 908 975 +7.4%
11 Vankal Khawzawl 326 356 +9.2%
12 Tualpui Khawzawl 589 644 +9.3%
13 Arro Khawzawl 156 171 +9.6%
14 Puilo Khawzawl 474 528 +11.4%
15 Chawngtlai Khawzawl 1,638 1,829 +11.7%
16 Chhawrtui Khawzawl 1,011 1,153 +14.1%
17 Khualen Khawzawl 239 275 +15.1%
18 Chalrang Khawzawl 696 810 +16.4%
19 Pamchung Khawzawl 303 372 +22.8%
20 Tlangpui Khawzawl 846 1,047 +23.8%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 0 excluded in total. How the limits are set.