Biggest population changes in Lawngtlai district
Computed from 134 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Lawngtlai district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chamdur �P� II | 196 | 480 | +144.9% |
| 2 | Kawrthindeng | 654 | 1,520 | +132.4% |
| 3 | Boranasury | 189 | 426 | +125.4% |
| 4 | Charluitlang | 108 | 237 | +119.4% |
| 5 | Kamalanagar-I | 1,415 | 3,000 | +112.0% |
| 6 | Fultuli | 348 | 721 | +107.2% |
| 7 | Rulkual | 406 | 805 | +98.3% |
| 8 | Tungosora | 149 | 287 | +92.6% |
| 9 | Laitlang | 182 | 350 | +92.3% |
| 10 | Montola | 426 | 789 | +85.2% |
| 11 | Siminasora | 215 | 392 | +82.3% |
| 12 | Tuithumhnar | 554 | 980 | +76.9% |
| 13 | Thaltlang | 416 | 733 | +76.2% |
| 14 | Kukurduleya | 481 | 832 | +73.0% |
| 15 | Saizawh �E� | 450 | 766 | +70.2% |
| 16 | Ajasora III | 239 | 403 | +68.6% |
| 17 | Kawlchaw �W� | 419 | 705 | +68.3% |
| 18 | Gerasury | 199 | 326 | +63.8% |
| 19 | Adubangasora | 248 | 404 | +62.9% |
| 20 | Silbanga | 185 | 300 | +62.2% |
Villages that shrank most in Lawngtlai district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bualpui Ng-II | 1,207 | 771 | -36.1% |
| 2 | Longpuighat | 1,265 | 811 | -35.9% |
| 3 | Baraguisury | 547 | 370 | -32.4% |
| 4 | Saikah u | 553 | 403 | -27.1% |
| 5 | Lungtian I | 1,551 | 1,176 | -24.2% |
| 6 | Karlui I | 1,226 | 938 | -23.5% |
| 7 | Bungtlang S-I | 2,186 | 1,703 | -22.1% |
| 8 | Parva I | 1,516 | 1,224 | -19.3% |
| 9 | Devasora �S� | 844 | 689 | -18.4% |
| 10 | Paithar | 675 | 564 | -16.4% |
| 11 | Hmunlai | 507 | 428 | -15.6% |
| 12 | Sihtlangpui | 630 | 539 | -14.4% |
| 13 | New Jaganasury-I | 878 | 764 | -13.0% |
| 14 | Betbonya | 440 | 389 | -11.6% |
| 15 | Udalthana II | 1,091 | 981 | -10.1% |
| 16 | T Dumzau | 457 | 450 | -1.5% |
| 17 | Ugudasury �S� | 992 | 978 | -1.4% |
| 18 | Saikhawthlir (Lawngtlai) | 225 | 228 | +1.3% |
| 19 | W.Saizawh | 482 | 506 | +5.0% |
| 20 | Kamalanagar II | 2,714 | 2,851 | +5.0% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
0 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.