Biggest population changes in Mamit district
Computed from 71 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Mamit district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mualthuam | 646 | 1,467 | +127.1% |
| 2 | Kananthar | 268 | 600 | +123.9% |
| 3 | Tumpanglui | 307 | 683 | +122.5% |
| 4 | Nalzawl | 449 | 934 | +108.0% |
| 5 | Kolalian | 645 | 1,250 | +93.8% |
| 6 | Vawngawnzo | 304 | 509 | +67.4% |
| 7 | Hriphaw | 748 | 1,208 | +61.5% |
| 8 | Hruaitluang | 386 | 607 | +57.3% |
| 9 | North Sabual | 233 | 362 | +55.4% |
| 10 | Bunghmun West (Zawlnuam) | 840 | 1,300 | +54.8% |
| 11 | Phulpui West | 621 | 960 | +54.6% |
| 12 | Phuldungsei | 1,628 | 2,496 | +53.3% |
| 13 | Pukzing vengthar | 328 | 497 | +51.5% |
| 14 | Tuirum | 494 | 725 | +46.8% |
| 15 | Bawngva | 760 | 1,101 | +44.9% |
| 16 | Dapchhuah | 1,023 | 1,480 | +44.7% |
| 17 | Hnahva | 1,164 | 1,630 | +40.0% |
| 18 | Bawngthah | 355 | 489 | +37.8% |
| 19 | Lengte | 583 | 800 | +37.2% |
| 20 | Damparengpui | 2,156 | 2,957 | +37.1% |
Villages that shrank most in Mamit district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kawrthah South | 2,812 | 1,767 | -37.2% |
| 2 | Sihthiang | 1,399 | 1,072 | -23.4% |
| 3 | Rajivnagar I | 3,530 | 2,969 | -15.9% |
| 4 | Chuhvel | 646 | 568 | -12.1% |
| 5 | Saikhawthlir (Zawlnuam) | 904 | 851 | -5.9% |
| 6 | Dampui | 741 | 738 | -0.4% |
| 7 | Suarhliap | 649 | 665 | +2.5% |
| 8 | Khawrihnim | 935 | 970 | +3.7% |
| 9 | Pukzing | 537 | 562 | +4.7% |
| 10 | Andermanik (Mamit) | 1,165 | 1,250 | +7.3% |
| 11 | New Eden | 634 | 682 | +7.6% |
| 12 | Kanghmun | 1,126 | 1,220 | +8.3% |
| 13 | Belkhai | 496 | 542 | +9.3% |
| 14 | Lungphun | 379 | 416 | +9.8% |
| 15 | SOUTH SABUAL | 637 | 703 | +10.4% |
| 16 | Tuipuibari | 1,992 | 2,200 | +10.4% |
| 17 | Reiek | 1,627 | 1,806 | +11.0% |
| 18 | Bawlte | 330 | 368 | +11.5% |
| 19 | Luimawi | 507 | 570 | +12.4% |
| 20 | Kawrtethawveng | 2,008 | 2,262 | +12.7% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
2 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
2 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.