GaonData

Biggest population changes in Saiha district

Computed from 39 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Saiha district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Niawhtlang-I Saiha 772 1,350 +74.9%
2 Thingsen Saiha 328 572 +74.4%
3 Riasikah Saiha 133 212 +59.4%
4 Rawmibawk Saiha 450 713 +58.4%
5 Chhuarlung-II Saiha 313 490 +56.5%
6 Niawhtlang-II Saiha 909 1,385 +52.4%
7 New Serkawr Tuipang 144 212 +47.2%
8 Siasi Saiha 344 500 +45.4%
9 Theiva Saiha 551 797 +44.6%
10 Mawhre Tuipang 540 770 +42.6%
11 Phalhrang Saiha 377 537 +42.4%
12 Kaisie Tuipang 442 610 +38.0%
13 Khopai Tuipang 631 860 +36.3%
14 Siatlai Tuipang 335 455 +35.8%
15 Tuipui Ferry Saiha 236 320 +35.6%
16 Maubawk �L� Saiha 599 789 +31.7%
17 Chheihlu Tuipang 530 675 +27.4%
18 Theiri Tuipang 626 790 +26.2%
19 Lungdar Tuipang 259 325 +25.5%
20 Amobyu CH Saiha 252 315 +25.0%

Villages that shrank most in Saiha district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Tuipang V- I Tuipang 1,655 1,025 -38.1%
2 Phura-N Tuipang 1,068 760 -28.8%
3 Tuisih-I Tuipang 878 668 -23.9%
4 Serkawr Tuipang 977 790 -19.1%
5 Chhuarlung-I Saiha 851 704 -17.3%
6 Siata-I Saiha 867 730 -15.8%
7 Lungbun-I Saiha 799 690 -13.6%
8 Laki-I Tuipang 1,012 878 -13.2%
9 Ahmypi Tuipang 247 220 -10.9%
10 Old Tuisumpui Saiha 395 420 +6.3%
11 Vahai Tuipang 826 890 +7.8%
12 Amobyu Vaithie Saiha 759 848 +11.7%
13 Bymari Tuipang 455 512 +12.5%
14 Tuipang �L� Tuipang 652 735 +12.7%
15 Longmasu Tuipang 329 374 +13.7%
16 New Latawh Tuipang 603 690 +14.4%
17 Lawngban Tuipang 607 723 +19.1%
18 Tongkalong Tuipang 478 580 +21.3%
19 Iana Saiha 559 687 +22.9%
20 Amobyu CH Saiha 252 315 +25.0%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 0 excluded in total. How the limits are set.