GaonData

Biggest population changes in Saitual district

Computed from 36 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Saitual district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Lailak Phullen 505 761 +50.7%
2 Mimbung Ngopa 1,990 2,901 +45.8%
3 Changzawl Ngopa 452 638 +41.1%
4 Suangpuilawn Phullen 1,724 2,400 +39.2%
5 Mualpheng Phullen 734 1,002 +36.5%
6 Saichal Ngopa 904 1,202 +33.0%
7 Luangpawn Phullen 469 623 +32.8%
8 N.Lungpher Phullen 857 1,109 +29.4%
9 Sihfa Phullen 958 1,228 +28.2%
10 Maite Phullen 994 1,265 +27.3%
11 Dilkhan Phullen 225 285 +26.7%
12 Phullen Phullen 1,911 2,395 +25.3%
13 Daido Phullen 603 750 +24.4%
14 N.Khawlek Phullen 769 950 +23.5%
15 Vanbawng Phullen 1,231 1,510 +22.7%
16 Pawlrang Ngopa 896 1,096 +22.3%
17 Lamherh Phullen 598 730 +22.1%
18 Phuaibuang Phullen 2,134 2,601 +21.9%
19 Hrianghmun Ngopa 583 695 +19.2%
20 Zawngin Phullen 617 732 +18.6%

Villages that shrank most in Saitual district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Khawkawn Ngopa 908 937 +3.2%
2 Ngopa Ngopa 4,155 4,416 +6.3%
3 Teikhang Ngopa 1,744 1,875 +7.5%
4 Lenchim Phullen 338 364 +7.7%
5 Hliappui Ngopa 1,547 1,727 +11.6%
6 Tualbung Phullen 824 922 +11.9%
7 Tawizo Phullen 419 478 +14.1%
8 N.E.Tlangnuam Phullen 658 752 +14.3%
9 Lamzawl Ngopa 350 405 +15.7%
10 Khawlian Phullen 1,804 2,091 +15.9%
11 N.E.Khawdungsei Ngopa 1,825 2,120 +16.2%
12 Kawlbem Ngopa 1,479 1,724 +16.6%
13 Thanglailung Phullen 785 921 +17.3%
14 Buhban Phullen 603 710 +17.7%
15 Chiahpui Ngopa 864 1,018 +17.8%
16 Khanpui Phullen 1,499 1,778 +18.6%
17 Zawngin Phullen 617 732 +18.6%
18 Hrianghmun Ngopa 583 695 +19.2%
19 Phuaibuang Phullen 2,134 2,601 +21.9%
20 Lamherh Phullen 598 730 +22.1%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 0 excluded in total. How the limits are set.