GaonData

Biggest population changes in Nagaland

Computed from 889 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Nagaland

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village District 20112020Change
1 Hakpang Longleng 1,602 3,991 +149.1%
2 Henbenji Kohima 278 692 +148.9%
3 Wangla Mon 940 2,331 +148.0%
4 Mohong Mon 864 2,140 +147.7%
5 Sanis Vill Wokha 1,416 3,500 +147.2%
6 Naga United Vill. Dimapur 1,492 3,685 +147.0%
7 Emlomi Zunheboto 306 755 +146.7%
8 Mbaupungwa Peren 811 2,000 +146.6%
9 Ngetghungching Longleng 112 276 +146.4%
10 Dhansiripar Vill. Dimapur 978 2,408 +146.2%
11 Tchujanphen Wokha 102 251 +146.1%
12 Chingei Tuensang 1,685 4,102 +143.4%
13 Ladaigarh Longleng 422 1,027 +143.4%
14 Zaphumi Zunheboto 245 595 +142.9%
15 Awohumi Zunheboto 269 650 +141.6%
16 Thillong (UR) Wokha 235 565 +140.4%
17 Tuophe Phezou Kohima 132 317 +140.2%
18 Longkhimong Kiphire 366 877 +139.6%
19 Kichilimi Zunheboto 691 1,649 +138.6%
20 K. Xekiye Dimapur 176 420 +138.6%

Villages that shrank most in Nagaland

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village District 20112020Change
1 Chumukedima Village Dimapur 2,779 1,842 -33.7%
2 Nzau Namsan Peren 1,199 800 -33.3%
3 Benrue Peren 850 594 -30.1%
4 Singrijan Dimapur 1,905 1,353 -29.0%
5 Inshikiur Kiphire 773 564 -27.0%
6 Lalong Peren 1,423 1,045 -26.6%
7 Chenloiso Mon 4,049 2,987 -26.2%
8 New Longmutra Kiphire 222 167 -24.8%
9 Ruzaphema Dimapur 2,396 1,810 -24.5%
10 Songnou Peren 188 145 -22.9%
11 Sukiur 'A' +'B' Tuensang 1,294 1,003 -22.5%
12 Suphayan Wokha 229 182 -20.5%
13 Yehokhu Dimapur 349 284 -18.6%
14 Disagaphu Dimapur 297 245 -17.5%
15 Heiranglwa Peren 476 394 -17.2%
16 Khuvuxu Zunheboto 476 411 -13.7%
17 Okotso Wokha 2,138 1,869 -12.6%
18 Old Thewati Phek 187 164 -12.3%
19 Shenghah Tangten Mon 3,415 3,014 -11.7%
20 Alaphumi Zunheboto 640 570 -10.9%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 5 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 5 excluded in total. How the limits are set.