GaonData

Biggest population changes in Dimapur district

Computed from 136 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Dimapur district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Naga United Vill. Chumukedima 1,492 3,685 +147.0%
2 Dhansiripar Vill. Dhansiripar 978 2,408 +146.2%
3 K. Xekiye Dhansiripar 176 420 +138.6%
4 XELHOZHE Kuhuboto 448 1,045 +133.3%
5 Luhezhe Aghunaqa 206 479 +132.5%
6 Darogajan Chumukedima 865 2,000 +131.2%
7 Zuheshe Niuland 310 710 +129.0%
8 Zhexuche Aghunaqa 111 252 +127.0%
9 Samaguri Chumukedima 661 1,500 +126.9%
10 Hoito Kuhuboto 348 789 +126.7%
11 Vishiyi Kuhuboto 305 680 +123.0%
12 Akito Kuhuboto 144 320 +122.2%
13 Dubagaon Chumukedima 599 1,330 +122.0%
14 Seithekema 'A' Medziphema 716 1,585 +121.4%
15 Yeveto Niuland 287 635 +121.3%
16 Xukiye Kuhuboto 260 572 +120.0%
17 Kashiram Chumukedima 1,111 2,420 +117.8%
18 Khughovi Kuhuboto 488 1,050 +115.2%
19 TSETHRONGSE Dhansiripar 674 1,398 +107.4%
20 Tenyiphe I Chumukedima 3,037 6,291 +107.2%

Villages that shrank most in Dimapur district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Chumukedima Village Chumukedima 2,779 1,842 -33.7%
2 Singrijan Dhansiripar 1,905 1,353 -29.0%
3 Ruzaphema Medziphema 2,396 1,810 -24.5%
4 Yehokhu Kuhuboto 349 284 -18.6%
5 Disagaphu Dhansiripar 297 245 -17.5%
6 Suhoi Kuhuboto 518 491 -5.2%
7 Tokugha Kuhuboto 473 450 -4.9%
8 Hozhukhe Niuland 1,460 1,411 -3.4%
9 Homeland Aghunaqa 726 725 -0.1%
10 Thilixu Chumukedima 6,169 6,178 +0.1%
11 Hevishe Kuhuboto 412 415 +0.7%
12 ZUTOVI A and B Dhansiripar 778 785 +0.9%
13 Viyito Niuland 360 372 +3.3%
14 Nikhekhu Niuland 2,379 2,480 +4.3%
15 Henito Niuland 352 369 +4.8%
16 Luhevi Aghunaqa 205 215 +4.9%
17 Tsuma Medziphema 477 502 +5.2%
18 Xukhuvi Aghunaqa 238 252 +5.9%
19 Kuhoxu Niuland 781 830 +6.3%
20 Tenyiphe II Chumukedima 1,550 1,660 +7.1%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 0 excluded in total. How the limits are set.