GaonData

Biggest population changes in Peren district

Computed from 62 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Peren district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Mbaupungwa Tenning 811 2,000 +146.6%
2 Jalukielo Jalukie 332 786 +136.8%
3 New Puilwa Peren 221 520 +135.3%
4 Old Puilwa Peren 199 465 +133.7%
5 Nzau Tenning 1,430 3,300 +130.8%
6 Ikiesingram Athibung 229 526 +129.7%
7 Heningkunglwa Peren 1,386 3,153 +127.5%
8 Sailhem Athibung 264 570 +115.9%
9 Jalukieram Jalukie 246 518 +110.6%
10 New Ngaulong Athibung 273 555 +103.3%
11 Nkio 'B' Athibung 218 435 +99.5%
12 Ngwalwa Vill. Jalukie 1,020 2,008 +96.9%
13 Jalukie 'B' Jalukie 2,387 4,550 +90.6%
14 Phanjang Athibung 314 592 +88.5%
15 Old Soget Athibung 370 690 +86.5%
16 Songlhun Athibung 512 936 +82.8%
17 Peren (New) Peren 383 687 +79.4%
18 New Jalukie Jalukie 2,470 4,430 +79.3%
19 Jalukie 'S' (J. Sangtam) Peren 196 351 +79.1%
20 Jalukie (Old) Jalukie 1,087 1,840 +69.3%

Villages that shrank most in Peren district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Nzau Namsan Tenning 1,199 800 -33.3%
2 Benrue Peren 850 594 -30.1%
3 Lalong Tenning 1,423 1,045 -26.6%
4 Songnou Athibung 188 145 -22.9%
5 Heiranglwa Tenning 476 394 -17.2%
6 Pellhang Athibung 658 630 -4.3%
7 Punglwa Jalukie 1,254 1,216 -3.0%
8 Beisumpuikam Jalukie 2,904 2,824 -2.8%
9 Nchangram Tenning 2,673 2,600 -2.7%
10 Gaili Peren 1,377 1,350 -2.0%
11 Azailong Tenning 1,147 1,150 +0.3%
12 Nkio (Old) Tenning 1,550 1,600 +3.2%
13 Ndunglwa Peren 424 455 +7.3%
14 New Tesen Tenning 2,093 2,250 +7.5%
15 Poilwa Namci Peren 679 735 +8.3%
16 Mbaulwa Tenning 1,236 1,344 +8.7%
17 Tepun Tenning 1,610 1,860 +15.5%
18 Jalukikam Jalukie 525 607 +15.6%
19 New Beisumpui Athibung 559 651 +16.5%
20 New Chalkot Athibung 402 475 +18.2%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 2 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 2 excluded in total. How the limits are set.