GaonData

Biggest population changes in Zunheboto district

Computed from 138 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Zunheboto district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Emlomi Akuhaito 306 755 +146.7%
2 Zaphumi Akuluto 245 595 +142.9%
3 Awohumi Ghathashi 269 650 +141.6%
4 Kichilimi Ghathashi 691 1,649 +138.6%
5 Sukhai Satakha 474 1,121 +136.5%
6 Achikhu A Suruhoto 365 855 +134.3%
7 Lazami Ghathashi 2,936 6,740 +129.6%
8 Kivikhu Satakha 481 1,102 +129.1%
9 Mukalimi Ghathashi 486 1,107 +127.8%
10 Koiboto Suruhoto 287 650 +126.5%
11 Mukhami Akuluto 304 679 +123.4%
12 Yehemi Suruhoto 1,092 2,353 +115.5%
13 Asukhuto Akuhaito 153 326 +113.1%
14 Khughuto Ghathashi 274 580 +111.7%
15 YESHELUTO Akuhaito 407 850 +108.8%
16 Mapulumi Akuhaito 609 1,270 +108.5%
17 Zhekiye Satakha 351 730 +108.0%
18 Ikiye Satoi 309 640 +107.1%
19 Kholeboto Suruhoto 179 370 +106.7%
20 Luvishe (Old) Tokiye 121 250 +106.6%

Villages that shrank most in Zunheboto district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Khuvuxu Satoi 476 411 -13.7%
2 Alaphumi Akuluto 640 570 -10.9%
3 Phuye (Old) Suruhoto 485 450 -7.2%
4 Baimbho Zunheboto 549 546 -0.6%
5 Phuye (New) Suruhoto 639 642 +0.5%
6 Kathara Suruhoto 291 298 +2.4%
7 Nihoshe (S) Tokiye 585 607 +3.8%
8 Shevishe Tokiye 1,017 1,059 +4.1%
9 Lukikhe Tokiye 860 902 +4.9%
10 Satoi Vill Satoi 525 556 +5.9%
11 Akhakhu Suruhoto 250 265 +6.0%
12 Nunumi Satakha 879 955 +8.7%
13 Lizu Naghuto Zunheboto 631 687 +8.9%
14 Lukhai Satakha 540 600 +11.1%
15 Lochami Zunheboto 921 1,025 +11.3%
16 Lizu (New) Zunheboto 513 572 +11.5%
17 Momi Satakha 381 425 +11.6%
18 Kiltomi Tokiye 616 690 +12.0%
19 Shena New Satakha 816 918 +12.5%
20 Khukiye Satakha 614 700 +14.0%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 0 excluded in total. How the limits are set.