GaonData

Biggest population changes in Bargarh district

Computed from 725 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Bargarh district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Katapali Bheden 492 1,150 +133.7%
2 Dumerpali Sohella 258 538 +108.5%
3 Ghanamal Padampur 1,925 3,735 +94.0%
4 Dakshinnuapali Padampur 640 1,228 +91.9%
5 Ganjaguda Padampur 236 450 +90.7%
6 Budelbahal Bheden 512 956 +86.7%
7 Gandapali Gaisilet 288 530 +84.0%
8 Nuniajampali Bargarh 1,318 2,409 +82.8%
9 Jalgarh Paikmal 358 650 +81.6%
10 Mahaberna Bijepur 359 650 +81.1%
11 Marjadapali Paikmal 143 257 +79.7%
12 Khaliamunda Paikmal 569 1,019 +79.1%
13 Bhutload Bheden 266 469 +76.3%
14 Chhotanki Jharbandh 1,139 2,000 +75.6%
15 Kasipali Sohella 950 1,640 +72.6%
16 Narendrapur Padampur 210 360 +71.4%
17 Pathrel Paikmal 1,501 2,567 +71.0%
18 Ambamunda Padampur 1,084 1,850 +70.7%
19 Kapati Jharbandh 345 586 +69.9%
20 Bhoipali Bijepur 189 320 +69.3%

Villages that shrank most in Bargarh district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Kalangapali Sohella 1,144 700 -38.8%
2 Kurlupali Jharbandh 1,274 804 -36.9%
3 Runipali Bhatli 782 505 -35.4%
4 Magha Gaisilet 379 250 -34.0%
5 Kamgoan Bhatli 4,567 3,090 -32.3%
6 Khalabahal Gaisilet 1,397 1,000 -28.4%
7 Pankeldadar Bheden 587 441 -24.9%
8 Temri Gaisilet 260 200 -23.1%
9 Badibahal Paikmal 516 403 -21.9%
10 Khaliapali Attabira 513 416 -18.9%
11 Birjupali Sohella 1,123 920 -18.1%
12 Kebad Barpali 2,110 1,730 -18.0%
13 Angul Jharbandh 1,106 910 -17.7%
14 Jogipali Bheden 1,302 1,088 -16.4%
15 Jaring Bijepur 3,368 2,870 -14.8%
16 Thuapali Bheden 1,173 1,018 -13.2%
17 Motipali Paikmal 173 155 -10.4%
18 Barangakot Ambabhona 605 544 -10.1%
19 Chal Ambabhona 186 168 -9.7%
20 Arda Bijepur 666 616 -7.5%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 6 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 7 excluded in total. How the limits are set.