GaonData

Biggest population changes in Deogarh district

Computed from 495 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Deogarh district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Brahmanipali(Nuasahi) Reamal 583 1,305 +123.8%
2 Gajaribania Tileibani 135 292 +116.3%
3 Sundhinali Reamal 164 349 +112.8%
4 Rajamunda Reamal 218 460 +111.0%
5 Khadinali Barkote 223 446 +100.0%
6 Surangipal Reamal 340 650 +91.2%
7 Gunduripasi Tileibani 213 404 +89.7%
8 Bargadia Tileibani 211 395 +87.2%
9 Brahmanidei Barkote 406 749 +84.5%
10 Majhichakundapal Barkote 376 683 +81.7%
11 Putbul Reamal 215 390 +81.4%
12 Ghantiposi Barkote 279 474 +69.9%
13 Jamunali Reamal 244 410 +68.0%
14 Gadpal Tileibani 340 570 +67.7%
15 Malarbahal Reamal 267 437 +63.7%
16 Sankarpur Reamal 255 415 +62.8%
17 Tileibani Tileibani 489 780 +59.5%
18 Niktimal Tileibani 432 678 +56.9%
19 Salarapal Reamal 123 190 +54.5%
20 Jambumunda Reamal 346 531 +53.5%

Villages that shrank most in Deogarh district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Hariharpur Barkote 122 80 -34.4%
2 Ambagaon Barkote 1,215 819 -32.6%
3 Karlaga Reamal 1,944 1,385 -28.8%
4 Sarapal Reamal 517 380 -26.5%
5 Chhalak Reamal 520 399 -23.3%
6 Kundheigola Reamal 1,808 1,390 -23.1%
7 Kandal Barkote 3,357 2,615 -22.1%
8 Nalabandha Barkote 793 620 -21.8%
9 Sibapali Barkote 315 250 -20.6%
10 Basantapur Reamal 703 559 -20.5%
11 Kushakhalia Reamal 776 620 -20.1%
12 Kamarnali Barkote 129 105 -18.6%
13 Jarichakundapal Barkote 526 445 -15.4%
14 Dudhianali Tileibani 586 500 -14.7%
15 Dangaghat(San) Reamal 367 315 -14.2%
16 Joshabantapur Tileibani 149 128 -14.1%
17 Lalitamohanpur Barkote 185 160 -13.5%
18 Kansar Tileibani 1,699 1,476 -13.1%
19 Terendakata Tileibani 722 631 -12.6%
20 Harekrishnapur Barkote 386 338 -12.4%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 85 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 85 excluded in total. How the limits are set.