GaonData

Biggest population changes in Nuapada district

Computed from 374 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Nuapada district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Gidhamal Sinapali 507 1,176 +131.9%
2 Dhumabhata Komna 687 1,582 +130.3%
3 Latkanpada Komna 521 1,130 +116.9%
4 Rajamunda Khariar 484 1,033 +113.4%
5 Makhapadar Komna 154 323 +109.7%
6 Sindursil Sinapali 302 580 +92.0%
7 Arada Khariar 586 1,100 +87.7%
8 Jenjera Nuapada 1,051 1,946 +85.2%
9 Akhadabhata Sinapali 189 340 +79.9%
10 Parasabhadar Nuapada 359 640 +78.3%
11 Bichhanapali Khariar 447 792 +77.2%
12 Sardhapur Sinapali 561 979 +74.5%
13 Gorla Sinapali 1,493 2,558 +71.3%
14 Beheradihi Nuapada 406 689 +69.7%
15 Babankera Nuapada 422 685 +62.3%
16 Chanamunda Komna 333 538 +61.6%
17 Larki Komna 557 895 +60.7%
18 Daldali Komna 151 240 +58.9%
19 Kantapali Komna 901 1,402 +55.6%
20 Bhojpurghati Komna 163 253 +55.2%

Villages that shrank most in Nuapada district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Bhaludungari Khariar 783 474 -39.5%
2 Bhera Nuapada 1,350 825 -38.9%
3 Silva Komna 2,355 1,509 -35.9%
4 Gadgada Komna 123 80 -35.0%
5 Amalapali Khariar 970 650 -33.0%
6 Rampurguma Khariar 324 218 -32.7%
7 Sardhapur Sinapali 819 582 -28.9%
8 Badamula Khariar 2,030 1,470 -27.6%
9 Konabira Komna 1,238 900 -27.3%
10 Deosil Komna 370 280 -24.3%
11 Sialati Komna 927 709 -23.5%
12 Dohelpada Khariar 979 758 -22.6%
13 Bisibahal Komna 1,236 975 -21.1%
14 Kurumpuri Komna 1,216 965 -20.6%
15 Dumerbahal Komna 890 710 -20.2%
16 Bakulikhunti(Kala) Boden 1,135 920 -18.9%
17 Bisora Nuapada 1,711 1,425 -16.7%
18 Kalimati Komna 343 290 -15.4%
19 Mahura Khariar 1,013 890 -12.1%
20 Semelpali Komna 864 762 -11.8%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 20 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 20 excluded in total. How the limits are set.