GaonData

Biggest population changes in Sambalpur district

Computed from 773 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Sambalpur district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Kurla Rengali 366 855 +133.6%
2 Gandajamumal Jamankira 156 356 +128.2%
3 Padiabahal Jujomura 1,229 2,753 +124.0%
4 Khairdihi Jamankira 250 549 +119.6%
5 Ludhapali Rengali 352 766 +117.6%
6 Khairabahal Kuchinda 120 260 +116.7%
7 Laija Naktideul 148 301 +103.4%
8 Madanmohanpur Kuchinda 176 344 +95.5%
9 Pondloi Rengali 1,128 2,200 +95.0%
10 Ghunghuti Bamra 705 1,356 +92.3%
11 Kelipadar Kuchinda 223 400 +79.4%
12 Bansimal Rengali 412 725 +76.0%
13 Baghiajungle Kuchinda 113 196 +73.5%
14 Junani Kuchinda 779 1,340 +72.0%
15 Ankadihi Jamankira 155 266 +71.6%
16 Kolohabahal Bamra 224 377 +68.3%
17 Padiabaadmal Jujomura 470 786 +67.2%
18 Katunagar Kuchinda 124 207 +66.9%
19 Brahmapura Rairakhol 265 438 +65.3%
20 Badturang Jujomura 762 1,248 +63.8%

Villages that shrank most in Sambalpur district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Gariabahal Jamankira 815 497 -39.0%
2 Gurla Bamra 1,701 1,060 -37.7%
3 Sirid Jamankira 872 574 -34.2%
4 Tileimal Jamankira 287 192 -33.1%
5 Kuilarijore Jamankira 422 284 -32.7%
6 Rangiatikira Bamra 1,003 684 -31.8%
7 Kanchanpur Naktideul 722 493 -31.7%
8 Ghenupali Jujomura 1,640 1,120 -31.7%
9 Manapali Jamankira 881 614 -30.3%
10 Ranekela Kuchinda 314 220 -29.9%
11 Jharmunda Jamankira 107 75 -29.9%
12 Haripada Bamra 931 654 -29.8%
13 Paruabhadi Kuchinda 1,158 820 -29.2%
14 Kushamura Jujomura 1,980 1,425 -28.0%
15 Mundakata Bamra 413 300 -27.4%
16 Rabga Bamra 1,345 988 -26.5%
17 Dumermal Kuchinda 484 360 -25.6%
18 Kaputikira Kuchinda 400 299 -25.3%
19 Chinimahul Jamankira 1,636 1,225 -25.1%
20 Godrapada Jamankira 1,085 813 -25.1%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 96 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 97 excluded in total. How the limits are set.