Biggest population changes in Faridkot district
Computed from 147 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Faridkot district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dawareana (109) | 1,812 | 4,500 | +148.3% |
| 2 | Mallewala (4) | 244 | 500 | +104.9% |
| 3 | Wara Bhaika (152) | 2,719 | 5,200 | +91.3% |
| 4 | Fatehgarh (11) | 2,721 | 5,200 | +91.1% |
| 5 | Chanian (25) | 1,434 | 2,650 | +84.8% |
| 6 | Pindi Balochan (38) | 1,632 | 2,670 | +63.6% |
| 7 | Gobindgarh (12) | 2,858 | 4,650 | +62.7% |
| 8 | Karirwali (5) | 2,511 | 4,004 | +59.5% |
| 9 | Bhag Singhwala (43) | 1,025 | 1,578 | +54.0% |
| 10 | Chak Sahu (22) | 367 | 515 | +40.3% |
| 11 | Kamiana (74) | 3,090 | 4,125 | +33.5% |
| 12 | Dalewala (13) | 1,033 | 1,372 | +32.8% |
| 13 | Sedha Singhwala (15) | 1,144 | 1,500 | +31.1% |
| 14 | Madhak (135) | 2,533 | 3,310 | +30.7% |
| 15 | Jeonwala (124) | 4,348 | 5,669 | +30.4% |
| 16 | Kauni (31) | 3,237 | 4,200 | +29.8% |
| 17 | Nangal (119) | 1,071 | 1,385 | +29.3% |
| 18 | Kaler (91) | 1,365 | 1,758 | +28.8% |
| 19 | Jhariwala (9) | 907 | 1,165 | +28.4% |
| 20 | Dhimanwali (98) | 2,927 | 3,747 | +28.0% |
Villages that shrank most in Faridkot district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mehmuana (59) | 2,729 | 1,680 | -38.4% |
| 2 | Khara (102) | 5,562 | 3,582 | -35.6% |
| 3 | Bagiana (121) | 2,333 | 1,657 | -29.0% |
| 4 | Sandhwan (111) | 6,080 | 4,632 | -23.8% |
| 5 | Matta (132) | 6,121 | 5,070 | -17.2% |
| 6 | Romana Albel Singh (128) | 1,894 | 1,570 | -17.1% |
| 7 | Dhab Sher Singhwala (63) | 1,443 | 1,200 | -16.8% |
| 8 | Sarawan (140) | 5,091 | 4,631 | -9.0% |
| 9 | Sirsari (116) | 1,767 | 1,610 | -8.9% |
| 10 | Deviwala (115) | 2,151 | 1,988 | -7.6% |
| 11 | Bhilewala (45) | 2,205 | 2,115 | -4.1% |
| 12 | Ramiana (137) | 4,799 | 4,735 | -1.3% |
| 13 | Hari Nau (105) | 5,711 | 5,721 | +0.2% |
| 14 | Tehna (92) | 3,631 | 3,643 | +0.3% |
| 15 | Maur (103) | 3,228 | 3,243 | +0.5% |
| 16 | Saideke (32) | 1,472 | 1,480 | +0.5% |
| 17 | Jhakharwala (149) | 3,341 | 3,361 | +0.6% |
| 18 | Panjgrain Kalan (126) | 10,663 | 10,800 | +1.3% |
| 19 | Lambwali (150) | 2,719 | 2,760 | +1.5% |
| 20 | Chet Singhwala (61) | 1,212 | 1,242 | +2.5% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
1 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
1 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.