Biggest population changes in Fazilka district
Computed from 300 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Fazilka district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bhagu (73) | 3,954 | 9,364 | +136.8% |
| 2 | Abhun (231) | 1,956 | 4,615 | +135.9% |
| 3 | Chak Paniwala (197) | 420 | 970 | +130.9% |
| 4 | Mohar Singhwala Hithar (356) | 308 | 710 | +130.5% |
| 5 | Chak Bhabra (233) | 378 | 840 | +122.2% |
| 6 | Choohriwala Chishti (263) | 2,067 | 4,506 | +118.0% |
| 7 | Theh Kalandar (224) | 1,064 | 2,300 | +116.2% |
| 8 | Bakhu Shah (282) | 531 | 1,038 | +95.5% |
| 9 | Chak Sukar (254) | 951 | 1,712 | +80.0% |
| 10 | Bodel Pire Ke (343) | 378 | 660 | +74.6% |
| 11 | Lakhowali (225) | 903 | 1,522 | +68.5% |
| 12 | Kandhwala Amarkot (83) | 5,033 | 8,250 | +63.9% |
| 13 | Muradwala Bhumgar (255) | 543 | 890 | +63.9% |
| 14 | Beganwali (240) | 2,098 | 3,400 | +62.1% |
| 15 | Kabul Shah Hithar (283) | 727 | 1,153 | +58.6% |
| 16 | Chuhriwala Dhana (129) | 7,310 | 11,540 | +57.9% |
| 17 | Khanwala (260) | 991 | 1,522 | +53.6% |
| 18 | Amarpura (79) | 4,680 | 7,186 | +53.5% |
| 19 | Panjkosi (123) | 4,012 | 6,150 | +53.3% |
| 20 | Ramnagar Urf Jatwali (300) | 811 | 1,234 | +52.2% |
Villages that shrank most in Fazilka district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Behak Hasta Uttar (307) | 1,951 | 1,210 | -38.0% |
| 2 | Shaman Khanka (225) | 2,319 | 1,477 | -36.3% |
| 3 | Bamewala (339) | 231 | 150 | -35.1% |
| 4 | Chak Sawah Wala (191) | 840 | 551 | -34.4% |
| 5 | Chak Manewala (195) | 1,549 | 1,022 | -34.0% |
| 6 | Basian (113) | 3,954 | 2,652 | -32.9% |
| 7 | Dhab Karyal (202) | 1,668 | 1,160 | -30.5% |
| 8 | Kikar Khera (81) | 5,068 | 3,560 | -29.8% |
| 9 | Chak Bhamba Wattu (235) | 780 | 548 | -29.7% |
| 10 | Baghe Ke Uttar (253) | 952 | 670 | -29.6% |
| 11 | Thatheran Wala (182) | 1,115 | 786 | -29.5% |
| 12 | Chak Paliwala (221) | 2,203 | 1,571 | -28.7% |
| 13 | Bahmaniwala (199) | 4,670 | 3,345 | -28.4% |
| 14 | Ganjuana (296) | 2,022 | 1,450 | -28.3% |
| 15 | Thara Singhwala Uttar (268) | 1,540 | 1,118 | -27.4% |
| 16 | Chak Lamochar (246) | 1,092 | 796 | -27.1% |
| 17 | Lamochar Khurd (243) | 1,391 | 1,040 | -25.2% |
| 18 | Dhandi Qadim (257) | 4,048 | 3,040 | -24.9% |
| 19 | Gobindgarh (119) | 5,346 | 4,035 | -24.5% |
| 20 | Dhippanwali (184) | 2,461 | 1,875 | -23.8% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
1 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
1 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.