GaonData

Makhu block

Firozepur district, Punjab · 118 villages

Villages
118
Average change
+11.2%
across 102 measurable villages
Population 2011 → 2020
75,611 → 81,881
compared villages only

Villages in this block

Village2011 2020Change
Akbarwala (94) 528 570 +8.0%
Alewala (21) 941 1,000 +6.3%
Aminwala (118) 465 552 +18.7%
Amir Shahwala (85) 680 — not measured
Arazi Sabrah (43) 531 610 +14.9%
Asafwala (17) 988 1,025 +3.7%
Ashieke (22) 882 910 +3.2%
Aulakh (460 201 230 +14.4%
Baharwali (47) 257 320 +24.5%
Bal (109) 492 460 -6.5%
Behbalwala (81) 31 42 +35.5%
Behk Fattu (143) 1,666 1,692 +1.6%
Behk Pasarian (141) 868 905 +4.3%
Behk Walayat Shah (142) 258 281 +8.9%
Bhedanwala (59/60) — — —
Bhupewala (71) 554 582 +5.0%
Bhutiwala (72) 353 246 -30.3%
Bir Sarkar (67) 45 56 +24.4%
Bodal Bagga (42--A ) — — —
Buh Araian (57) — — —
Buh Gujran (112) 622 632 +1.6%
Burj Mohamad Shahwala (111) 605 702 +16.0%
Butewala (24) 829 950 +14.6%
Chak Dhangarh (128) — — —
Chak Khanna (230) 159 182 +14.5%
Chak Mahrana (129) 619 755 +22.0%
Chak Tibbi Tayab (220) 332 368 +10.8%
Chakkian (68) 1,050 1,067 +1.6%
Chamb (136) 972 1,025 +5.5%
Changian (62) 114 127 +11.4%
Churian (58) 235 280 +19.1%
Dibwala (88) 275 352 +28.0%
Dineke (53) 148 170 +14.9%
Fatehgarh Sabrah (41) 2,459 3,650 +48.4%
Fattewala (20) 901 1,005 +11.5%
Game Muradewala (37/38) 165 200 +21.2%
Gati Harike (54/55) 242 273 +12.8%
Gatta Badshah (45) 944 1,061 +12.4%
Gatta Dalel (79) 123 129 +4.9%
Ghuduwala (34) 2,063 2,060 -0.1%
Gurali (86) 215 280 +30.2%
Hadayatullahwala (89) — — —
Hamadwala Hithar (16) 672 802 +19.4%
Hardo Jand (78) — — —
Hashmatwala (26) 1,688 1,722 +2.0%
Jaggewala Alias Musewala (133) 244 250 +2.5%
Jamaliwala (216) 209 255 +22.0%
Jattanwali (25) 557 610 +9.5%
Jhamke (32) 572 602 +5.2%
Jhanda Bagga Nawan(108) 744 818 +9.9%
Jogewala (83/84) 2,079 2,081 +0.1%
Kalhiwala (70) 26 53 +103.8%
Kamalwala (18) 1,967 1,736 -11.7%
Khadur (134) 1,436 1,447 +0.8%
Khanna (97) 1,123 1,122 -0.1%
Khiali (96) 252 256 +1.6%
Killi Bodla (33) 805 812 +0.9%
Killi Gudha (40) 572 636 +11.2%
Kot Qaim Khan (64) 61 — unreliable
Lalleh (110) 785 652 -16.9%
Laluwala (221) 808 855 +5.8%
Lehra Bet (119) 1,029 1,031 +0.2%
Machhian (139) 291 354 +21.6%
Madahar Kalu (91) 91 110 +20.9%
Madahar Shera (98) 321 — not measured
Mahlewala (222) 1,374 1,451 +5.6%
Mahmudwala (82) 851 856 +0.6%
Malang Shahwala (113) 331 342 +3.3%
Malhewala (138) 667 680 +1.9%
Malhuwaliawala (15) 2,111 2,420 +14.6%
Mamnewala (74) — — —
Manjwala (69) 760 802 +5.5%
Mannu Machhi (80) 593 810 +36.6%
Mannu Machhi Chak (217) — — —
Mashieke (19) 664 805 +21.2%
Mastewala (137) 704 770 +9.4%
Maujgarh (56) 321 360 +12.2%
Mithe (31) 427 750 +75.6%
Mohamad Shahwala (90) 210 261 +24.3%
Mohkamwala Alias Araianwala (130) 450 492 +9.3%
Mubarewala (114) 105 — not measured
Mundi Chhurimaran (87) 2,267 2,272 +0.2%
Nangal (117) 303 322 +6.3%
Nihalke (39) 442 496 +12.2%
Nizam Dinwala (51) 1,320 1,341 +1.6%
Padhri (48/49) 828 854 +3.1%
Phemiwala (121/122) 665 722 +8.6%
Pir Mohamad (116) 2,392 2,400 +0.3%
Qutabpura (131) 515 502 -2.5%
Rasulpur (65) 1,514 1,606 +6.1%
Rode Jallewala (23) 1,602 1,745 +8.9%
Roshan Shahwala (140) 592 — not measured
Ruknewala Kalan (73) 387 392 +1.3%
Ruknewala Khurd (76) 8 — unreliable
Sadarwala (127) 508 562 +10.6%
Sadhara (14) 1,030 1,202 +16.7%
Shah Dinwala (75) 29 18 -37.9%
Sharaf Ali Shahwala (100) 468 472 +0.8%
Shianpari (135) 2,264 2,319 +2.4%
Silewind (95) 534 570 +6.7%
Singheke Kalan (77) — — —
Sirhali (35) 1,059 1,062 +0.3%
Sudan (66) 1,725 1,912 +10.8%
Sudhia (61) 184 191 +3.8%
Talwandi Nepalan (50) 2,745 2,917 +6.3%
Tanna Bagga (42-B) 26 28 +7.7%
Tibbi Araian (120) 361 392 +8.6%
Tibbi Badra (219) — — —
Tibbi Badra (93) 59 80 +35.6%
Tibbi Rang (92) 165 195 +18.2%
Tibbi Ranga (218) 352 386 +9.7%
Variah (126) 820 928 +13.2%
Walayat Shahwala (36) 256 352 +37.5%
Wara Kalirana (224) 895 905 +1.1%
Wara Suleman (229) 219 230 +5.0%
Wariswala Jattan (115) 684 860 +25.7%
Warpal (30) 1,090 1,500 +37.6%
Watu Bhatti (52) 358 396 +10.6%

Blocks are the administrative tier between district and village. The block a village belongs to comes from the Local Government Directory via the 2020 survey, so it reflects boundaries as of 2020, not 2011.