Biggest population changes in Mansa district
Computed from 194 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Mansa district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deluana (122) | 1,607 | 2,641 | +64.3% |
| 2 | Kot Lallu (54) | 2,614 | 4,000 | +53.0% |
| 3 | Khara (119) | 1,973 | 3,000 | +52.0% |
| 4 | Maujian (109) | 1,367 | 1,809 | +32.3% |
| 5 | Ramgarh Shah Purian (158) | 1,119 | 1,419 | +26.8% |
| 6 | Ali Sher Khurd (11) | 1,598 | 2,021 | +26.5% |
| 7 | Khilian (45) | 1,510 | 1,830 | +21.2% |
| 8 | Fatehgarh Sahnianwali (151) | 1,261 | 1,528 | +21.2% |
| 9 | Hirewala (120) | 1,647 | 1,990 | +20.8% |
| 10 | Khokhar Khurd (74) | 2,028 | 2,420 | +19.3% |
| 11 | Dullowala (112) | 2,641 | 3,146 | +19.1% |
| 12 | Nangal Khurd (113) | 2,444 | 2,910 | +19.1% |
| 13 | Moda (175) | 283 | 335 | +18.4% |
| 14 | Sadda Singhwala (72) | 2,004 | 2,370 | +18.3% |
| 15 | Jitgarh Urf Biroke Khurd (41) | 1,467 | 1,730 | +17.9% |
| 16 | Dalel Singhwala (51) | 3,157 | 3,720 | +17.8% |
| 17 | Saharna (121) | 1,708 | 2,008 | +17.6% |
| 18 | Burj Dhilwan (63) | 3,916 | 4,602 | +17.5% |
| 19 | Malakpur Bhimra (135) | 983 | 1,150 | +17.0% |
| 20 | Khokhar Kalan (75) | 3,404 | 3,967 | +16.5% |
Villages that shrank most in Mansa district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Banawala (91) | 2,857 | 1,875 | -34.4% |
| 2 | Thuthianwali (57) | 4,567 | 3,217 | -29.6% |
| 3 | Bhalaike (105) | 1,457 | 1,120 | -23.1% |
| 4 | Achanak (142) | 1,422 | 1,152 | -19.0% |
| 5 | Bahadarpur (158) | 6,146 | 5,435 | -11.6% |
| 6 | Jatana Kalan (147) | 4,444 | 3,961 | -10.9% |
| 7 | Jaurkian (96) | 2,591 | 2,347 | -9.4% |
| 8 | Sangha (203) | 5,406 | 4,912 | -9.1% |
| 9 | Jawaharke (114) | 4,339 | 4,000 | -7.8% |
| 10 | Khiali Chahianwali (163) | 2,122 | 2,022 | -4.7% |
| 11 | Kalho (10) | 2,141 | 2,041 | -4.7% |
| 12 | Sardulewala (184) | 2,676 | 2,627 | -1.8% |
| 13 | Lakhmirwala (123) | 1,701 | 1,687 | -0.8% |
| 14 | Khiwadialuwala (23 | 1,684 | 1,680 | -0.2% |
| 15 | Gobindpura (164) | 1,697 | 1,702 | +0.3% |
| 16 | Jassarwala (28) | 576 | 578 | +0.3% |
| 17 | Fafre Bhaike (46) | 4,645 | 4,665 | +0.4% |
| 18 | Khiala Kalan (52) | 6,358 | 6,390 | +0.5% |
| 19 | Jhanduke (170) | 5,220 | 5,250 | +0.6% |
| 20 | Uddat Bhagat Ram (110) | 2,257 | 2,272 | +0.7% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
0 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.