Biggest population changes in S.A.S Nagar district
Computed from 305 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in S.A.S Nagar district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mundhon Bhag Singh (135) | 180 | 410 | +127.8% |
| 2 | Sangriwala (345) | 575 | 1,210 | +110.4% |
| 3 | Jagatpur (261) | 6,673 | 13,020 | +95.1% |
| 4 | Mehmudpur (368) | 114 | 220 | +93.0% |
| 5 | Chahar Majra (19) | 503 | 961 | +91.0% |
| 6 | Bahora (29) | 216 | 350 | +62.0% |
| 7 | Deh Kalan (365) | 280 | 450 | +60.7% |
| 8 | Tarrak (188) | 934 | 1,500 | +60.6% |
| 9 | Bhagsi (193) | 1,008 | 1,600 | +58.7% |
| 10 | Jhawansa (191) | 949 | 1,500 | +58.1% |
| 11 | Rurka (263) | 1,062 | 1,672 | +57.4% |
| 12 | Bhukhri (192) | 716 | 1,100 | +53.6% |
| 13 | Kheri Jattan (186) | 1,176 | 1,800 | +53.1% |
| 14 | Seehpur (176) | 199 | 300 | +50.8% |
| 15 | Chapar Chiri Kalan (195) | 343 | 500 | +45.8% |
| 16 | Alipur (252) | 353 | 510 | +44.5% |
| 17 | Jaula kalan (180) | 1,817 | 2,592 | +42.6% |
| 18 | Sangaundh (194) | 213 | 300 | +40.9% |
| 19 | Salempur Khurd (317) | 396 | 550 | +38.9% |
| 20 | Jheur Heri (253) | 991 | 1,376 | +38.9% |
Villages that shrank most in S.A.S Nagar district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Raipur Khurd (2) | 907 | 591 | -34.8% |
| 2 | Saini Majra (271) | 163 | 115 | -29.4% |
| 3 | Chhoti Bari Parachh (349) | 1,975 | 1,450 | -26.6% |
| 4 | Sahauran (95) | 3,820 | 3,170 | -17.0% |
| 5 | Bar Majra (25) | 7,031 | 5,946 | -15.4% |
| 6 | Dau Majra (76) | 1,404 | 1,198 | -14.7% |
| 7 | Baliali (34) | 1,058 | 940 | -11.2% |
| 8 | Landran (37) | 2,338 | 2,102 | -10.1% |
| 9 | Bakarpur (264) | 2,292 | 2,073 | -9.6% |
| 10 | Radiala (77) | 1,302 | 1,210 | -7.1% |
| 11 | Sarsini (153) | 1,856 | 1,754 | -5.5% |
| 12 | Ballo Majra (32) | 1,492 | 1,424 | -4.6% |
| 13 | Gobindgarh (296) | 1,906 | 1,830 | -4.0% |
| 14 | Khadri (336) | 225 | 220 | -2.2% |
| 15 | Majra (332) | 1,310 | 1,292 | -1.4% |
| 16 | Kalewal (112) | 1,116 | 1,110 | -0.5% |
| 17 | Rajo Majra (23) | 1,039 | 1,035 | -0.4% |
| 18 | Takipur (158) | 589 | 588 | -0.2% |
| 19 | Labangarh (319) | 879 | 880 | +0.1% |
| 20 | Ghandauli (169) | 893 | 895 | +0.2% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
5 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
5 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.