GaonData

Biggest population changes in Rajasthan

Computed from 31,416 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Rajasthan

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village District 20112020Change
1 Khumsingh Nagar Jaisalmer 875 2,180 +149.1%
2 Mandesar Ka Gurha Udaipur 418 1,041 +149.0%
3 Vinodilalpura Jaipur 255 635 +149.0%
4 Sankhala Udaipur 237 590 +148.9%
5 Kethooda Bundi 1,406 3,500 +148.9%
6 Goth Alwar 884 2,200 +148.9%
7 Tamariya Jaipur 1,836 4,568 +148.8%
8 Kesaripura Jhunjhunu 804 2,000 +148.8%
9 Dhamaniya Jhalawar 281 699 +148.8%
10 Hansla Chittorgarh 189 470 +148.7%
11 Kableshwar Dausa 1,456 3,620 +148.6%
12 Kanspura Dholpur 362 900 +148.6%
13 Vishma Udaipur 1,006 2,500 +148.5%
14 Ramner Dhani Ajmer 3,824 9,500 +148.4%
15 Angrawali Bharatpur 1,852 4,600 +148.4%
16 Megwalon Ki Dhani Barmer 604 1,500 +148.3%
17 Parnala Banswara 409 1,015 +148.2%
18 Bas Kheriya Tonk 226 560 +147.8%
19 Asooka Bharatpur 300 743 +147.7%
20 Maliyan Dhani Dausa 840 2,080 +147.6%

Villages that shrank most in Rajasthan

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village District 20112020Change
1 Basri Kalan Sikar 1,155 700 -39.4%
2 Mahalpur Baran 330 200 -39.4%
3 Dhodiya Banswara 2,547 1,544 -39.4%
4 Jarkhoda Bundi 1,295 785 -39.4%
5 Ramthara Karauli 1,534 930 -39.4%
6 Pachkodiya Jaipur 2,143 1,300 -39.3%
7 Kalani Nagar Jodhpur 534 324 -39.3%
8 Padra Banswara 412 250 -39.3%
9 Kalawat Udaipur 1,977 1,200 -39.3%
10 Ghotra Churu 683 415 -39.2%
11 Haron Banswara 724 440 -39.2%
12 Shyampura Bhilwara 3,207 1,950 -39.2%
13 Nawa Tapra Banswara 961 585 -39.1%
14 Turkwas Alwar 230 140 -39.1%
15 Kamba Udaipur 1,314 800 -39.1%
16 Jailalpura Sawai Madhopur 886 540 -39.0%
17 Agarpura Jaipur 1,079 658 -39.0%
18 Bandheri Jodhpur 656 400 -39.0%
19 Kherad Udaipur 492 300 -39.0%
20 Panna Ka Khera Bhilwara 328 200 -39.0%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 1,322 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 24 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 1,346 excluded in total. How the limits are set.