Biggest population changes in Jhunjhunu district
Computed from 789 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Jhunjhunu district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kesaripura | 804 | 2,000 | +148.8% |
| 2 | Raghuveerpura | 426 | 1,050 | +146.5% |
| 3 | Sewa Nagar | 353 | 854 | +141.9% |
| 4 | Syaloo Kalan | 939 | 2,134 | +127.3% |
| 5 | Shree Krishan Nagar | 2,480 | 5,632 | +127.1% |
| 6 | Parasrampura | 6,284 | 13,966 | +122.3% |
| 7 | Bhutiyawas | 979 | 2,175 | +122.2% |
| 8 | Jodhpura | 2,135 | 4,736 | +121.8% |
| 9 | Bhopalpura | 698 | 1,506 | +115.8% |
| 10 | Makado | 2,841 | 6,070 | +113.7% |
| 11 | Sohli | 2,286 | 4,829 | +111.2% |
| 12 | Tonk Dhaka Ki Dhani | 450 | 950 | +111.1% |
| 13 | Ghaseda | 2,390 | 5,000 | +109.2% |
| 14 | Kansinghpura | 723 | 1,510 | +108.8% |
| 15 | Gugan Ki Dhani | 421 | 875 | +107.8% |
| 16 | Govindpura | 296 | 612 | +106.8% |
| 17 | Raipur ( Aheeran ) | 1,621 | 3,350 | +106.7% |
| 18 | Pichanwasi | 717 | 1,460 | +103.6% |
| 19 | Dhani Bhajnawali | 1,097 | 2,233 | +103.6% |
| 20 | Besarda | 3,186 | 6,310 | +98.0% |
Villages that shrank most in Jhunjhunu district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lal Garh | 3,380 | 2,114 | -37.5% |
| 2 | Shivsingh Pura | 584 | 366 | -37.3% |
| 3 | Bajawa | 5,274 | 3,415 | -35.3% |
| 4 | Teetanwar | 5,552 | 3,658 | -34.1% |
| 5 | Chirani | 2,966 | 1,980 | -33.2% |
| 6 | Poojari Ki Dhani | 3,566 | 2,382 | -33.2% |
| 7 | TAL | 2,014 | 1,391 | -30.9% |
| 8 | Ashok Nagar | 1,464 | 1,043 | -28.8% |
| 9 | Deota | 3,969 | 2,957 | -25.5% |
| 10 | Chelasi | 2,589 | 1,935 | -25.3% |
| 11 | Gadoli | 1,518 | 1,150 | -24.2% |
| 12 | Girdharpura Shahpura | 2,609 | 2,050 | -21.4% |
| 13 | Dhamora | 4,938 | 3,980 | -19.4% |
| 14 | Bharwari | 1,115 | 900 | -19.3% |
| 15 | Pilani ( Rural ) | 553 | 450 | -18.6% |
| 16 | Kankariya | 5,347 | 4,450 | -16.8% |
| 17 | Pratappura | 2,591 | 2,170 | -16.3% |
| 18 | Dheerasar | 888 | 747 | -15.9% |
| 19 | Tonk Chhilari | 2,535 | 2,160 | -14.8% |
| 20 | Bheekhansar | 1,420 | 1,232 | -13.2% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
3 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
3 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.