GaonData

Biggest population changes in Jodhpur district

Computed from 1,381 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Jodhpur district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Baori Khurd Phalodi 606 1,500 +147.5%
2 Jorawar Nagar Bap 328 808 +146.3%
3 Gaje Singh Nagar Sekhala 267 655 +145.3%
4 Ganesh Nagar Bap 352 860 +144.3%
5 Tajaliya Dhawa 123 300 +143.9%
6 Ramnagar Shergarh 1,388 3,382 +143.7%
7 Vijay Nagar Phalodi 824 2,000 +142.7%
8 Samrathalpura Aau 462 1,120 +142.4%
9 Satlana Luni 2,508 6,000 +139.2%
10 Visansar Bap 252 600 +138.1%
11 Hungaon Khurd Bilara 423 1,000 +136.4%
12 Nathasar Shergarh 289 680 +135.3%
13 Matol Ghantiyali 427 1,000 +134.2%
14 Ekalthali Bap 216 505 +133.8%
15 Tejsingh Nagar Chamu 292 682 +133.6%
16 Dabar Lohawat 397 920 +131.7%
17 Shri Karani Nagar Chamu 332 763 +129.8%
18 Dedipa Nada Keru 1,393 3,200 +129.7%
19 Kushlawa Dechu 787 1,800 +128.7%
20 Nathdau Chamu 1,749 4,000 +128.7%

Villages that shrank most in Jodhpur district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Kalani Nagar Chamu 534 324 -39.3%
2 Bandheri Bap 656 400 -39.0%
3 Ma Sati Nagar Chamu 745 456 -38.8%
4 Palri Khichiyan Keru 1,380 850 -38.4%
5 Nainasar Dhawa 567 350 -38.3%
6 Saran Nagar Mandor 771 480 -37.7%
7 Karani Keru 1,860 1,160 -37.6%
8 Senai Dhawa 1,919 1,200 -37.5%
9 Babu Singh Nagar Chamu 398 250 -37.2%
10 Udainagar Aau 2,260 1,425 -37.0%
11 Deogarh Balesar 948 600 -36.7%
12 Mehramnagar Dhawa 789 500 -36.6%
13 Naron Ki Dhani Keru 740 470 -36.5%
14 Sang Singh Nagar Chamu 511 325 -36.4%
15 Motalji Ka Bas Balesar 786 500 -36.4%
16 Balaji Nagar Luni 1,579 1,020 -35.4%
17 Ram Nagar Aau 1,899 1,230 -35.2%
18 Bambor Purohitan Keru 389 254 -34.7%
19 Khudala Dhawa 2,976 2,000 -32.8%
20 Dungargarh Chamu 752 506 -32.7%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 6 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 3 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 9 excluded in total. How the limits are set.