GaonData

Biggest population changes in Rajsamand district

Computed from 556 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Rajsamand district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Kheri Khamnor 597 1,461 +144.7%
2 Rampuriya Delwada 152 360 +136.8%
3 Gamri Ki Nal Kumbhalgarh 349 825 +136.4%
4 Beer Deogarh Deogarh 466 1,041 +123.4%
5 Shyopura Ass Bhim 476 1,046 +119.8%
6 Bheel Khera Bhim 638 1,362 +113.5%
7 Jainagar Bhim 965 2,000 +107.3%
8 Jalpa Bhim 1,203 2,469 +105.2%
9 Melawari Kumbhalgarh 404 825 +104.2%
10 Pandolai Rajsamand 402 800 +99.0%
11 Halai Ki Bhagal Kumbhalgarh 342 671 +96.2%
12 Takadiyon Ka Gurha Delwada 1,340 2,625 +95.9%
13 Asan Deogarh 763 1,490 +95.3%
14 Kemri Amet 242 472 +95.0%
15 Nakli Rajsamand 720 1,390 +93.1%
16 Bhartawa Bhim 1,001 1,905 +90.3%
17 Odagujran Amet 374 699 +86.9%
18 Udawaton Ki Bhagal Khamnor 593 1,105 +86.3%
19 Peetha Ka Khera Deogarh 227 420 +85.0%
20 Papamal Delwada 423 780 +84.4%

Villages that shrank most in Rajsamand district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Boraj Rajsamand 1,564 964 -38.4%
2 Peepalantri Kalan Rajsamand 1,022 640 -37.4%
3 Bhiyaz Khamnor 476 300 -37.0%
4 Thaneta Bhim 1,961 1,239 -36.8%
5 Khakhliya Khera Rajsamand 1,580 1,012 -36.0%
6 Ota Bhim 946 609 -35.6%
7 Pharara Rajsamand 3,697 2,397 -35.2%
8 Satlewa Khamnor 1,019 680 -33.3%
9 Nenpuriya Khamnor 1,008 700 -30.6%
10 Mokela Khamnor 1,240 873 -29.6%
11 Chandela Ki Guaar Bhim 1,939 1,367 -29.5%
12 Peepalwas Delwada 1,328 945 -28.8%
13 Kushalpura Bhim 1,847 1,318 -28.6%
14 Kada Ka Talab Rajsamand 630 452 -28.3%
15 Barjal Bhim 3,135 2,286 -27.1%
16 Dawer Bhim 4,480 3,269 -27.0%
17 Moyna Deogarh 373 273 -26.8%
18 Barar Bhim 2,010 1,496 -25.6%
19 Molela Khamnor 4,275 3,230 -24.4%
20 Parwat Kheri Rajsamand 391 300 -23.3%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 13 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 2 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 15 excluded in total. How the limits are set.