GaonData

Biggest population changes in East District district

Computed from 86 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in East District district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Yangtam Pakyong 420 1,007 +139.8%
2 Bhusuk Nandok 374 892 +138.5%
3 Changey Senti (Tsaney) Pakyong 951 1,983 +108.5%
4 Tathangchen Nandok 936 1,857 +98.4%
5 Ranka Ranka 609 1,138 +86.9%
6 Lingzey (Simik) Khamdong 384 665 +73.2%
7 Linkey Parkha 592 992 +67.6%
8 Chinzey Ranka 517 805 +55.7%
9 Chadey Khamdong 256 379 +48.0%
10 Tareythang Pakyong 736 1,074 +45.9%
11 Lamaten Reghu 611 867 +41.9%
12 Rawtey Rumtek Ranka 1,573 2,150 +36.7%
13 Singbel Rakdong Tintek 1,979 2,694 +36.1%
14 Namin Martam 304 410 +34.9%
15 Machong Parkha 1,311 1,765 +34.6%
16 Beng Khamdong 535 711 +32.9%
17 Taza Pakyong 1,899 2,500 +31.6%
18 Tarpin Rhenock 1,858 2,427 +30.6%
19 Namcheybong Pakyong 5,128 6,623 +29.1%
20 Tumlabung Martam 383 489 +27.7%

Villages that shrank most in East District district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Chujachen Reghu 4,781 3,060 -36.0%
2 Naitam Nandok 1,265 827 -34.6%
3 Syari Nandok 3,826 2,504 -34.5%
4 Dikling Pacheykhani Pakyong 580 394 -32.1%
5 Parbing Ranka 459 322 -29.9%
6 Kamerey Basmey Duga 1,861 1,336 -28.2%
7 Lingchey Nandok 2,055 1,505 -26.8%
8 Lingdum Ranka 2,589 1,912 -26.1%
9 Patuk Rakdong Tintek 2,236 1,679 -24.9%
10 dikling Pakyong 976 737 -24.5%
11 Chotta Singtam Pakyong 1,574 1,189 -24.5%
12 Subaneydara Reghu 1,749 1,344 -23.2%
13 West Pendam Duga 6,587 5,239 -20.5%
14 Mulukey Rhenock 851 711 -16.4%
15 Samdong Rakdong Tintek 2,125 1,862 -12.4%
16 Lingzey Duga 962 880 -8.5%
17 Central Pendam Duga 5,434 5,000 -8.0%
18 Rabdang Khamdong 424 392 -7.5%
19 Lingtam Reghu 1,347 1,250 -7.2%
20 Dolepchen Reghu 2,553 2,396 -6.2%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 1 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 1 excluded in total. How the limits are set.