GaonData

Biggest population changes in South District district

Computed from 120 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in South District district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Tingrithang Namchi 514 1,018 +98.0%
2 Passi Namthang 500 924 +84.8%
3 Ramabung Sumbuk 844 1,398 +65.6%
4 Assangthang Namchi 785 1,288 +64.1%
5 Donak Namthang 302 451 +49.3%
6 Namlung Ravangla 947 1,407 +48.6%
7 Salleybong Namchi 606 896 +47.9%
8 Borong Ravangla 1,033 1,524 +47.5%
9 Sorok Namchi 474 689 +45.4%
10 Gangchung Temi 546 763 +39.7%
11 Pallum Namchi 204 273 +33.8%
12 Tinkitam Ravangla 749 1,002 +33.8%
13 PAKYTAM Namthang 255 338 +32.5%
14 Tsalumthang Temi 901 1,186 +31.6%
15 Phamthang Ravangla 619 804 +29.9%
16 Sangbung Namchi 874 1,126 +28.8%
17 Jarrong Ravangla 874 1,104 +26.3%
18 Ralong Ravangla 680 852 +25.3%
19 Gom Namchi 1,163 1,457 +25.3%
20 Phalidara Namchi 808 1,001 +23.9%

Villages that shrank most in South District district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Suntaley Sumbuk 410 256 -37.6%
2 Kamrang Namchi 1,440 920 -36.1%
3 Sangmoo Ravangla 1,532 995 -35.0%
4 Temi Temi 1,195 793 -33.6%
5 Turung Namthang 1,121 775 -30.9%
6 Nalam Kolbung Namthang 1,013 717 -29.2%
7 Singhithang Namchi 338 249 -26.3%
8 Boomtar Namchi 944 699 -25.9%
9 Rateypani Namthang 1,269 951 -25.1%
10 Kopchey Namchi 727 586 -19.4%
11 Deu Temi 1,098 905 -17.6%
12 Lingzo Ravangla 776 671 -13.5%
13 Lingding Ravangla 506 440 -13.0%
14 Gagyong Yangang 1,873 1,632 -12.9%
15 Paiyong Sumbuk 1,054 932 -11.6%
16 Tarku Temi 1,856 1,643 -11.5%
17 Kartikey Sumbuk 876 783 -10.6%
18 Ben Temi 2,200 1,975 -10.2%
19 Maneydara Namthang 892 805 -9.8%
20 Yangang Yangang 1,505 1,368 -9.1%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 0 excluded in total. How the limits are set.