Biggest population changes in Ariyalur district
Computed from 147 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Ariyalur district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kovil Esanai (East) | 1,834 | 4,417 | +140.8% |
| 2 | Udayavarthiyanur | 2,392 | 5,300 | +121.6% |
| 3 | Parukkal (West) | 1,659 | 3,530 | +112.8% |
| 4 | Parukkal (East) | 1,785 | 3,714 | +108.1% |
| 5 | Anikudichan (North) | 1,192 | 2,078 | +74.3% |
| 6 | Pirancheri | 1,202 | 2,074 | +72.5% |
| 7 | Adhanakurichi | 3,772 | 6,503 | +72.4% |
| 8 | Kovil Esanai (West) | 1,711 | 2,917 | +70.5% |
| 9 | Edayar | 3,287 | 5,542 | +68.6% |
| 10 | Karaiyavetti | 3,051 | 5,136 | +68.3% |
| 11 | Ammbappur | 3,159 | 5,300 | +67.8% |
| 12 | Sripurandan (South) | 1,399 | 2,300 | +64.4% |
| 13 | Silumbur (South) | 2,778 | 4,465 | +60.7% |
| 14 | Kadugur | 3,217 | 5,045 | +56.8% |
| 15 | Kayarlabath | 5,215 | 8,168 | +56.6% |
| 16 | T.Sholankurichi (North) | 2,339 | 3,612 | +54.4% |
| 17 | Alagapuram | 5,334 | 7,921 | +48.5% |
| 18 | Uliyankudi | 3,643 | 5,408 | +48.5% |
| 19 | T.Sholankurichi (South) | 2,164 | 3,146 | +45.4% |
| 20 | Ariyalur (North) | 4,147 | 6,014 | +45.0% |
Villages that shrank most in Ariyalur district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Periyavalayam | 3,282 | 1,989 | -39.4% |
| 2 | Guruvalapparkovil | 6,742 | 4,128 | -38.8% |
| 3 | Andipattakkadu | 3,848 | 2,388 | -37.9% |
| 4 | Kulamanickam (West) | 4,074 | 2,555 | -37.3% |
| 5 | Govindaputhur | 4,850 | 3,050 | -37.1% |
| 6 | Pilakurichi | 3,942 | 2,551 | -35.3% |
| 7 | Unjini | 5,021 | 3,271 | -34.9% |
| 8 | Anaikudam | 4,444 | 2,900 | -34.7% |
| 9 | Vilupanankurichi | 2,056 | 1,452 | -29.4% |
| 10 | Siruvalur | 2,155 | 1,524 | -29.3% |
| 11 | Managethi | 3,916 | 2,779 | -29.0% |
| 12 | Vilandai (North) | 3,247 | 2,310 | -28.9% |
| 13 | Paranam | 4,844 | 3,489 | -28.0% |
| 14 | Kuvagam | 5,807 | 4,204 | -27.6% |
| 15 | Oriyur | 1,703 | 1,267 | -25.6% |
| 16 | Chinnapattakadu | 2,811 | 2,155 | -23.3% |
| 17 | Sriraman | 1,601 | 1,261 | -21.2% |
| 18 | Periakrishnapuram | 5,565 | 4,467 | -19.7% |
| 19 | Pappakudi (South) | 6,133 | 5,120 | -16.5% |
| 20 | Thalavoi (South) | 4,478 | 3,755 | -16.1% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
0 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.