Biggest population changes in Chengalpattu district
Computed from 422 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Chengalpattu district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pattaravakkam | 608 | 1,500 | +146.7% |
| 2 | Nadurvakkarai | 564 | 1,351 | +139.5% |
| 3 | Avirimedu | 562 | 1,344 | +139.2% |
| 4 | Mogalvadi | 1,088 | 2,562 | +135.5% |
| 5 | Kadappari | 151 | 355 | +135.1% |
| 6 | Pasuvankaranai | 162 | 380 | +134.6% |
| 7 | Murugamangalam | 460 | 1,077 | +134.1% |
| 8 | Chettipunyam | 1,543 | 3,539 | +129.4% |
| 9 | Perumbakkam | 2,448 | 5,515 | +125.3% |
| 10 | Kizhur | 1,305 | 2,893 | +121.7% |
| 11 | Porunthavakkam | 175 | 386 | +120.6% |
| 12 | Alagusamudram | 846 | 1,829 | +116.2% |
| 13 | Thandarai | 551 | 1,175 | +113.3% |
| 14 | Thuraiyur | 187 | 396 | +111.8% |
| 15 | Arungal | 688 | 1,454 | +111.3% |
| 16 | Kayapakkam | 3,123 | 6,560 | +110.0% |
| 17 | Thondamanallur | 2,187 | 4,565 | +108.7% |
| 18 | Kodithandalam | 508 | 1,060 | +108.7% |
| 19 | Kovilancheri | 1,253 | 2,600 | +107.5% |
| 20 | Othivakkam | 803 | 1,658 | +106.5% |
Villages that shrank most in Chengalpattu district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vedavakkam | 1,652 | 1,001 | -39.4% |
| 2 | Kasbapuram | 2,606 | 1,586 | -39.1% |
| 3 | Vinayaganallur | 814 | 505 | -38.0% |
| 4 | Thandarai | 1,299 | 810 | -37.6% |
| 5 | Anaikunnam | 2,013 | 1,264 | -37.2% |
| 6 | Palur | 6,964 | 4,379 | -37.1% |
| 7 | Veerapuram | 1,724 | 1,087 | -37.0% |
| 8 | Vadamanipakkam | 1,912 | 1,213 | -36.6% |
| 9 | Palayanur | 4,213 | 2,781 | -34.0% |
| 10 | Melkanagampattu | 483 | 320 | -33.8% |
| 11 | Neikuppi | 6,814 | 4,525 | -33.6% |
| 12 | Kolathur | 1,279 | 851 | -33.5% |
| 13 | Siruvangunam | 131 | 90 | -31.3% |
| 14 | Kavadur | 1,033 | 720 | -30.3% |
| 15 | Kannimangalam | 983 | 688 | -30.0% |
| 16 | Athiyur | 681 | 480 | -29.5% |
| 17 | Manamathy | 3,457 | 2,464 | -28.7% |
| 18 | Perukkaranai | 2,366 | 1,690 | -28.6% |
| 19 | Kunnathur | 2,183 | 1,575 | -27.9% |
| 20 | Athivakkam | 1,088 | 786 | -27.8% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
6 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
7 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.