Biggest population changes in Coimbatore district
Computed from 146 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Coimbatore district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kurumbapalayam | 2,755 | 6,750 | +145.0% |
| 2 | Arisippalayam | 2,400 | 5,658 | +135.8% |
| 3 | Devarayapuram | 2,931 | 6,867 | +134.3% |
| 4 | Rasichettipalayam | 688 | 1,595 | +131.8% |
| 5 | Koolanaickenpatti | 1,635 | 3,747 | +129.2% |
| 6 | Jadayampalayam | 10,049 | 20,585 | +104.8% |
| 7 | Naranapuram | 2,111 | 4,244 | +101.0% |
| 8 | Naickenpalayam | 5,914 | 11,828 | +100.0% |
| 9 | Vellamadai | 6,874 | 13,162 | +91.5% |
| 10 | Madavarayapuram | 6,365 | 12,100 | +90.1% |
| 11 | Kulakkalpalayam | 3,042 | 5,678 | +86.7% |
| 12 | Kittasuarampalayam | 1,589 | 2,950 | +85.7% |
| 13 | Pappampatti | 4,143 | 7,654 | +84.8% |
| 14 | Peedampalli | 3,896 | 7,182 | +84.3% |
| 15 | Arasampalayam | 3,818 | 7,036 | +84.3% |
| 16 | Kalangal | 5,590 | 9,700 | +73.5% |
| 17 | Agraharasamakulam | 4,144 | 6,920 | +67.0% |
| 18 | Seerappalayam | 5,881 | 9,618 | +63.5% |
| 19 | Palathurai | 2,727 | 4,301 | +57.7% |
| 20 | Nanjundapuram | 9,355 | 14,525 | +55.3% |
Villages that shrank most in Coimbatore district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Somandurai | 5,559 | 3,497 | -37.1% |
| 2 | Kulathur | 389 | 253 | -35.0% |
| 3 | Karunchamigoundenpalayam | 343 | 255 | -25.7% |
| 4 | Govindapuram | 1,249 | 960 | -23.1% |
| 5 | Thippampatti | 4,315 | 3,400 | -21.2% |
| 6 | Sinna Negamam | 1,825 | 1,440 | -21.1% |
| 7 | Kuthiraialampalayam | 1,448 | 1,153 | -20.4% |
| 8 | Devanampalayam | 3,641 | 2,941 | -19.2% |
| 9 | Kallipatti | 999 | 852 | -14.7% |
| 10 | Kunnathur | 4,281 | 3,765 | -12.1% |
| 11 | Mettupalayam (Part) | 1,546 | 1,360 | -12.0% |
| 12 | Vaguthampalayam | 341 | 300 | -12.0% |
| 13 | Periakalandai | 1,915 | 1,690 | -11.8% |
| 14 | Chettiakkapalayam | 3,370 | 2,987 | -11.4% |
| 15 | Mettubavi | 2,485 | 2,236 | -10.0% |
| 16 | Andipalayam | 3,315 | 3,007 | -9.3% |
| 17 | Bilichi | 10,412 | 9,500 | -8.8% |
| 18 | Kothavadi | 1,565 | 1,450 | -7.3% |
| 19 | Valukkupparai | 4,891 | 4,591 | -6.1% |
| 20 | Sokkanur | 6,020 | 5,660 | -6.0% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
0 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.