Biggest population changes in Dharmapuri district
Computed from 301 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Dharmapuri district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rengampatti | 637 | 1,574 | +147.1% |
| 2 | Mangade | 232 | 550 | +137.1% |
| 3 | Balasamudram | 238 | 548 | +130.3% |
| 4 | Suramatham | 331 | 760 | +129.6% |
| 5 | Upparahalli | 1,273 | 2,920 | +129.4% |
| 6 | Gopichettipalayam | 406 | 910 | +124.1% |
| 7 | Selambai | 250 | 560 | +124.0% |
| 8 | Mekalanayakanahalli | 159 | 344 | +116.3% |
| 9 | Kelavalli | 3,154 | 6,807 | +115.8% |
| 10 | Dodampatty | 1,874 | 3,997 | +113.3% |
| 11 | Pallipatti | 723 | 1,524 | +110.8% |
| 12 | Pudinattam | 409 | 853 | +108.6% |
| 13 | Samanattam | 191 | 393 | +105.8% |
| 14 | Nachanampatty | 271 | 550 | +103.0% |
| 15 | Mangalapatty | 298 | 600 | +101.3% |
| 16 | Jakkasamudram | 5,302 | 10,642 | +100.7% |
| 17 | Sitiganahalli | 338 | 669 | +97.9% |
| 18 | Ilaiyampatty | 611 | 1,205 | +97.2% |
| 19 | Achalvadi | 2,907 | 5,729 | +97.1% |
| 20 | Errabaiyanahalli | 1,936 | 3,800 | +96.3% |
Villages that shrank most in Dharmapuri district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Veppilaimuthempatti | 6,909 | 4,390 | -36.5% |
| 2 | Vellalapatti | 609 | 400 | -34.3% |
| 3 | Chintalpadi | 5,448 | 3,666 | -32.7% |
| 4 | Nekkundhi | 5,352 | 3,640 | -32.0% |
| 5 | Mattiyampatti | 945 | 650 | -31.2% |
| 6 | Sittilingi | 1,474 | 1,020 | -30.8% |
| 7 | Laligam | 7,601 | 5,364 | -29.4% |
| 8 | Mambadi | 1,241 | 950 | -23.4% |
| 9 | Bolabhaguthanhalli | 996 | 765 | -23.2% |
| 10 | Nadupatti | 767 | 604 | -21.3% |
| 11 | Dhalavaihalli | 6,724 | 5,301 | -21.2% |
| 12 | Kurumbatty | 129 | 102 | -20.9% |
| 13 | Kuruthampatty | 594 | 478 | -19.5% |
| 14 | Booganahalli | 5,240 | 4,275 | -18.4% |
| 15 | Ganapathipatty | 1,116 | 915 | -18.0% |
| 16 | Navalai | 3,127 | 2,568 | -17.9% |
| 17 | Naranapuram | 1,465 | 1,206 | -17.7% |
| 18 | Papichettipatti | 1,308 | 1,096 | -16.2% |
| 19 | Manjarahalli | 6,997 | 5,870 | -16.1% |
| 20 | Dindal | 3,009 | 2,525 | -16.1% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
5 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
6 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.