Biggest population changes in Kanchipuram district
Computed from 296 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Kanchipuram district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mettukuppam | 1,016 | 2,520 | +148.0% |
| 2 | Suramenikuppam | 439 | 1,078 | +145.6% |
| 3 | Padoor | 713 | 1,750 | +145.4% |
| 4 | Silambakkam | 461 | 1,061 | +130.2% |
| 5 | Ettikuthimedu | 227 | 520 | +129.1% |
| 6 | Sendamangalam | 726 | 1,654 | +127.8% |
| 7 | Karai | 2,091 | 4,607 | +120.3% |
| 8 | Kurumanjeri | 666 | 1,450 | +117.7% |
| 9 | Vishakandikuppam | 232 | 505 | +117.7% |
| 10 | Kolathur | 1,136 | 2,443 | +115.0% |
| 11 | Thaipakkam | 727 | 1,550 | +113.2% |
| 12 | Poonthandalam | 3,117 | 6,553 | +110.2% |
| 13 | Kandamangalam | 463 | 954 | +106.0% |
| 14 | Thodur | 550 | 1,125 | +104.5% |
| 15 | Orathur | 1,744 | 3,485 | +99.8% |
| 16 | Chinnalambadi | 434 | 860 | +98.2% |
| 17 | Attuputhur | 928 | 1,820 | +96.1% |
| 18 | Santhavelur | 4,817 | 9,429 | +95.7% |
| 19 | Angambakkam | 1,907 | 3,658 | +91.8% |
| 20 | Injambakkam | 1,000 | 1,890 | +89.0% |
Villages that shrank most in Kanchipuram district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nandimedu | 393 | 238 | -39.4% |
| 2 | Mambakkam | 2,501 | 1,523 | -39.1% |
| 3 | Sekkankulam | 654 | 400 | -38.8% |
| 4 | Sennakuppam | 965 | 603 | -37.5% |
| 5 | Thiruvenkaranai | 1,668 | 1,070 | -35.9% |
| 6 | Puliyambakkam | 2,158 | 1,395 | -35.4% |
| 7 | Padicheri | 293 | 190 | -35.1% |
| 8 | Visoor | 1,686 | 1,110 | -34.2% |
| 9 | Keeranallur | 919 | 630 | -31.4% |
| 10 | Vengadu | 1,011 | 695 | -31.3% |
| 11 | Neervalur | 671 | 470 | -30.0% |
| 12 | Manampathy | 6,447 | 4,535 | -29.7% |
| 13 | Vaipoor | 1,803 | 1,290 | -28.4% |
| 14 | Uveri | 452 | 334 | -26.1% |
| 15 | Edayarpakkam | 1,497 | 1,110 | -25.9% |
| 16 | Oragadam | 819 | 612 | -25.3% |
| 17 | Madavilagam | 470 | 352 | -25.1% |
| 18 | Kaliyampoondi | 2,426 | 1,820 | -25.0% |
| 19 | Bavasahibpettai | 593 | 450 | -24.1% |
| 20 | Enadur | 6,531 | 5,060 | -22.5% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
4 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
5 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.