Biggest population changes in Perambalur district
Computed from 122 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Perambalur district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pasumbalur (South) | 2,674 | 6,228 | +132.9% |
| 2 | Veppanthattai (South) | 3,373 | 6,228 | +84.6% |
| 3 | Pennakonam (North) | 1,159 | 2,039 | +75.9% |
| 4 | Kolathur (East) | 1,896 | 3,250 | +71.4% |
| 5 | Paravai (East) | 1,619 | 2,692 | +66.3% |
| 6 | Kalpadi (North) | 4,380 | 6,992 | +59.6% |
| 7 | Sathanur | 1,749 | 2,777 | +58.8% |
| 8 | Pimbalur | 2,621 | 3,903 | +48.9% |
| 9 | Adhanur (North) | 2,535 | 3,684 | +45.3% |
| 10 | Sillakudi (South) | 1,346 | 1,943 | +44.4% |
| 11 | Veppanthattai (North) | 10,148 | 14,620 | +44.1% |
| 12 | Sirumathur | 5,421 | 7,798 | +43.9% |
| 13 | Varagupadi | 1,524 | 2,190 | +43.7% |
| 14 | Elambalur | 10,357 | 14,860 | +43.5% |
| 15 | Aranarai (South) | 2,752 | 3,917 | +42.3% |
| 16 | Keelakkarai | 5,334 | 7,562 | +41.8% |
| 17 | Keelapuliyur (South) | 2,687 | 3,800 | +41.4% |
| 18 | Kannapady | 1,599 | 2,250 | +40.7% |
| 19 | Kilamathur (North) | 1,409 | 1,976 | +40.2% |
| 20 | Malavarayanallur | 633 | 887 | +40.1% |
Villages that shrank most in Perambalur district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alagiripalayam | 2,687 | 1,698 | -36.8% |
| 2 | Sillakudi (North) | 1,647 | 1,050 | -36.3% |
| 3 | Kottarai | 2,329 | 1,511 | -35.1% |
| 4 | Bhujangarayanallur | 1,807 | 1,185 | -34.4% |
| 5 | Ladapuram (East) | 8,537 | 5,800 | -32.1% |
| 6 | Varagur | 3,717 | 2,672 | -28.1% |
| 7 | Kaikalathur (West) | 3,345 | 2,509 | -25.0% |
| 8 | Siruvayalur | 5,800 | 4,379 | -24.5% |
| 9 | Periyammapalayam | 3,099 | 2,343 | -24.4% |
| 10 | Thondappadi | 3,966 | 3,027 | -23.7% |
| 11 | Nannai (West) | 1,275 | 984 | -22.8% |
| 12 | Pennakonam (South) | 3,932 | 3,331 | -15.3% |
| 13 | Mettupalayam (South) | 2,538 | 2,256 | -11.1% |
| 14 | Karai (West) | 2,104 | 1,934 | -8.1% |
| 15 | Keelapuliyur (North) | 5,091 | 4,775 | -6.2% |
| 16 | Thevaiyur(North) | 4,655 | 4,469 | -4.0% |
| 17 | Ammapalayam | 5,692 | 5,689 | -0.1% |
| 18 | Kunnam | 3,853 | 3,854 | +0.0% |
| 19 | Odium | 1,598 | 1,599 | +0.1% |
| 20 | Pillankulam | 3,083 | 3,092 | +0.3% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
0 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.