Biggest population changes in Thiruvallur district
Computed from 402 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Thiruvallur district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lingapayampettai | 381 | 950 | +149.3% |
| 2 | Thottareddykandigai | 242 | 570 | +135.5% |
| 3 | Adhilivakkam | 149 | 350 | +134.9% |
| 4 | Banaveduthottam | 1,137 | 2,621 | +130.5% |
| 5 | Vellanur | 11,668 | 26,736 | +129.1% |
| 6 | Senganyam | 542 | 1,240 | +128.8% |
| 7 | Kunjaram | 657 | 1,496 | +127.7% |
| 8 | Karunakaracheri | 875 | 1,952 | +123.1% |
| 9 | Manjankaranai | 1,088 | 2,386 | +119.3% |
| 10 | Periakarumbur | 696 | 1,508 | +116.7% |
| 11 | Pudupakkam | 386 | 829 | +114.8% |
| 12 | Valuthigaimedu | 1,279 | 2,730 | +113.5% |
| 13 | Tirur | 6,027 | 12,791 | +112.2% |
| 14 | New Erumaivettipalayam | 1,654 | 3,500 | +111.6% |
| 15 | Avoor | 1,344 | 2,800 | +108.3% |
| 16 | Perittivakkam | 565 | 1,157 | +104.8% |
| 17 | Korakkanthandalam | 342 | 700 | +104.7% |
| 18 | Mappedu | 4,205 | 8,601 | +104.5% |
| 19 | Karanai | 1,881 | 3,810 | +102.5% |
| 20 | Asanabudur | 584 | 1,165 | +99.5% |
Villages that shrank most in Thiruvallur district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peddanagapudi | 2,465 | 1,493 | -39.4% |
| 2 | Krishnasamudram | 7,157 | 4,373 | -38.9% |
| 3 | Gollalakuppam | 3,454 | 2,145 | -37.9% |
| 4 | Harichandrapuram | 5,811 | 3,611 | -37.9% |
| 5 | Devalambapuram | 2,537 | 1,577 | -37.8% |
| 6 | Panapakkam | 4,551 | 2,843 | -37.5% |
| 7 | Koduveli | 3,605 | 2,252 | -37.5% |
| 8 | Keelanur | 1,749 | 1,103 | -36.9% |
| 9 | Siruniam | 1,329 | 840 | -36.8% |
| 10 | Voyalanallur | 6,525 | 4,141 | -36.5% |
| 11 | Keerapakkam | 801 | 511 | -36.2% |
| 12 | Kottaiyur | 2,424 | 1,560 | -35.6% |
| 13 | Vathattur | 1,359 | 875 | -35.6% |
| 14 | Ayanallur | 2,110 | 1,399 | -33.7% |
| 15 | Egattur | 4,842 | 3,211 | -33.7% |
| 16 | Thirupachur | 12,353 | 8,300 | -32.8% |
| 17 | Nedigallu | 3,315 | 2,250 | -32.1% |
| 18 | Allikuzhi | 2,555 | 1,743 | -31.8% |
| 19 | Ammambakkam | 2,349 | 1,631 | -30.6% |
| 20 | Perumbedu | 2,608 | 1,837 | -29.6% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
2 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 3 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
5 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.