Biggest population changes in Tirupathur district
Computed from 102 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Tirupathur district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vadacheri | 2,550 | 6,300 | +147.1% |
| 2 | Jolarpettai R.F. | 276 | 652 | +136.2% |
| 3 | Nacharkuppam | 1,447 | 3,226 | +122.9% |
| 4 | Chinnakannalapatti | 1,162 | 2,582 | +122.2% |
| 5 | Karumbur | 942 | 1,931 | +105.0% |
| 6 | Pudupatti | 726 | 1,487 | +104.8% |
| 7 | kannadikuppam | 1,891 | 3,800 | +101.0% |
| 8 | Natham | 2,451 | 4,831 | +97.1% |
| 9 | Komeswaram | 955 | 1,808 | +89.3% |
| 10 | Elayanagaram | 3,451 | 6,200 | +79.7% |
| 11 | Periyakannalapatti | 1,502 | 2,582 | +71.9% |
| 12 | Thekkupattu | 2,843 | 4,751 | +67.1% |
| 13 | Velathigamanibenta | 1,287 | 2,134 | +65.8% |
| 14 | Avalnayakkanpatti | 1,073 | 1,761 | +64.1% |
| 15 | Vinnamangalam | 5,632 | 9,000 | +59.8% |
| 16 | Parsanapalli | 1,403 | 2,213 | +57.7% |
| 17 | Bapanapalli | 853 | 1,300 | +52.4% |
| 18 | Odayamuthur | 5,148 | 7,838 | +52.3% |
| 19 | Pachoor | 7,200 | 10,805 | +50.1% |
| 20 | Chandrapuram | 7,977 | 11,950 | +49.8% |
Villages that shrank most in Tirupathur district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Karungalipatti | 357 | 224 | -37.3% |
| 2 | Chinnavarikam | 3,556 | 2,300 | -35.3% |
| 3 | Chinnamottur | 4,867 | 3,150 | -35.3% |
| 4 | Gummidigampatti | 4,570 | 2,962 | -35.2% |
| 5 | Madapalli | 14,868 | 9,800 | -34.1% |
| 6 | Chinnaveppambattu | 4,443 | 2,952 | -33.6% |
| 7 | Chinnarampatti | 4,721 | 3,211 | -32.0% |
| 8 | kammiyambattu | 1,371 | 933 | -31.9% |
| 9 | Katteri | 7,348 | 5,158 | -29.8% |
| 10 | Kalendira | 7,490 | 5,319 | -29.0% |
| 11 | Kadirampatti | 6,624 | 4,801 | -27.5% |
| 12 | Pullur | 5,253 | 3,824 | -27.2% |
| 13 | Perumapattu | 10,195 | 7,436 | -27.1% |
| 14 | Madanancheri | 7,429 | 5,428 | -26.9% |
| 15 | Kammakrishnapalli | 729 | 550 | -24.6% |
| 16 | Kadirimangalam | 5,649 | 4,275 | -24.3% |
| 17 | Girisamudram | 5,271 | 3,989 | -24.3% |
| 18 | Thokkiyam | 6,487 | 4,927 | -24.1% |
| 19 | Thumberi | 7,618 | 5,850 | -23.2% |
| 20 | Mookanur | 6,882 | 5,562 | -19.2% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
1 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.