Biggest population changes in Tiruppur district
Computed from 252 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Tiruppur district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Naranapuram | 14,018 | 33,980 | +142.4% |
| 2 | Karadibavi | 3,647 | 8,533 | +134.0% |
| 3 | Karumapalayam | 1,735 | 3,877 | +123.5% |
| 4 | Chinnagoundanvalasu | 1,874 | 4,181 | +123.1% |
| 5 | Papankulam | 3,358 | 7,460 | +122.2% |
| 6 | Chinnavalavadi | 2,371 | 5,254 | +121.6% |
| 7 | Sukkampalayam | 4,420 | 9,692 | +119.3% |
| 8 | Guruvappanaickanur | 1,281 | 2,805 | +119.0% |
| 9 | Kaniampundi | 2,888 | 6,200 | +114.7% |
| 10 | Peranjervali | 3,876 | 8,318 | +114.6% |
| 11 | Thattaravaluvu | 1,650 | 3,499 | +112.1% |
| 12 | Kethanur | 3,797 | 8,008 | +110.9% |
| 13 | Jilobanaickampalayam | 755 | 1,574 | +108.5% |
| 14 | Periavalavadi | 2,896 | 5,642 | +94.8% |
| 15 | Ponnapuram | 2,655 | 5,090 | +91.7% |
| 16 | Naranapuram | 3,038 | 5,700 | +87.6% |
| 17 | Bogigoundendasarapatti | 615 | 1,125 | +82.9% |
| 18 | Kathanganni | 2,221 | 4,050 | +82.3% |
| 19 | Nadupatti | 861 | 1,547 | +79.7% |
| 20 | Valayapalayam | 632 | 1,120 | +77.2% |
Villages that shrank most in Tiruppur district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Velampoondi | 2,539 | 1,569 | -38.2% |
| 2 | Southboothinatham | 1,460 | 990 | -32.2% |
| 3 | Venkitapuram | 421 | 302 | -28.3% |
| 4 | Erumakkarampalayam | 536 | 395 | -26.3% |
| 5 | Lakkumanaickenpatti | 4,177 | 3,306 | -20.9% |
| 6 | Vadugapalayam | 3,226 | 2,622 | -18.7% |
| 7 | Setti Kuttai | 894 | 765 | -14.4% |
| 8 | Chitravathanpalayam | 8,089 | 7,082 | -12.4% |
| 9 | Mettupalayam | 453 | 400 | -11.7% |
| 10 | Kuppandampalayam | 2,009 | 1,780 | -11.4% |
| 11 | Vadamugam Kangayapalayam | 1,262 | 1,124 | -10.9% |
| 12 | Dalavoipattinam | 7,310 | 6,647 | -9.1% |
| 13 | Velayudhampalayam | 758 | 700 | -7.7% |
| 14 | Vadasinnaripalayam | 1,952 | 1,827 | -6.4% |
| 15 | Kammalakuttai | 1,699 | 1,624 | -4.4% |
| 16 | Athukinathupatti | 1,565 | 1,506 | -3.8% |
| 17 | Thumbalapatti | 2,261 | 2,187 | -3.3% |
| 18 | Veedampatti | 2,219 | 2,153 | -3.0% |
| 19 | Keetapalayam | 3,579 | 3,500 | -2.2% |
| 20 | Kandiankoil | 6,953 | 6,830 | -1.8% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
0 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.