Biggest population changes in Tiruvannamalai district
Computed from 802 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Tiruvannamalai district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Agaramsibbandi | 404 | 992 | +145.5% |
| 2 | Tirukalur Valavetti | 442 | 1,072 | +142.5% |
| 3 | Poondi | 741 | 1,793 | +142.0% |
| 4 | Padiyambattu | 809 | 1,950 | +141.0% |
| 5 | Su.Kilnachipattu | 1,292 | 3,100 | +139.9% |
| 6 | Thiruvarangam Valavetti | 460 | 1,072 | +133.0% |
| 7 | Mangalam | 480 | 1,086 | +126.3% |
| 8 | Koozhamandal | 1,750 | 3,866 | +120.9% |
| 9 | Keelamanjanoor | 1,701 | 3,739 | +119.8% |
| 10 | Gangalamahadevi | 556 | 1,218 | +119.1% |
| 11 | Kilnakkarai | 1,628 | 3,557 | +118.5% |
| 12 | Nambedu | 1,732 | 3,750 | +116.5% |
| 13 | Nallavanpalayam | 2,302 | 4,892 | +112.5% |
| 14 | Nammiyampattu | 3,983 | 8,455 | +112.3% |
| 15 | Akkarapatti | 124 | 260 | +109.7% |
| 16 | Nalladisenai | 438 | 915 | +108.9% |
| 17 | Mel Kolathur | 496 | 1,024 | +106.5% |
| 18 | Ariyampoondi | 283 | 580 | +105.0% |
| 19 | Maruthuvambady | 1,575 | 3,226 | +104.8% |
| 20 | Perunduraipattu | 1,618 | 3,286 | +103.1% |
Villages that shrank most in Tiruvannamalai district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vinnamangalam | 3,303 | 2,006 | -39.3% |
| 2 | Visamangalam | 1,651 | 1,021 | -38.2% |
| 3 | Villaripattu | 314 | 195 | -37.9% |
| 4 | Tirusoor | 3,051 | 1,899 | -37.8% |
| 5 | Thellur | 2,868 | 1,817 | -36.6% |
| 6 | Veliambakkam | 3,077 | 1,950 | -36.6% |
| 7 | Vazhavandal | 444 | 283 | -36.3% |
| 8 | Velleri | 3,736 | 2,388 | -36.1% |
| 9 | Jambodai | 938 | 600 | -36.0% |
| 10 | Perumuttam | 247 | 160 | -35.2% |
| 11 | Pappampady | 636 | 415 | -34.8% |
| 12 | Sorakolathur | 4,952 | 3,235 | -34.7% |
| 13 | Athipadi | 1,291 | 853 | -33.9% |
| 14 | Vinnuvampattu | 2,349 | 1,560 | -33.6% |
| 15 | Severapoondi | 3,528 | 2,360 | -33.1% |
| 16 | Sengunam | 2,803 | 1,896 | -32.4% |
| 17 | Devanathur | 637 | 436 | -31.6% |
| 18 | Velanandal | 1,809 | 1,275 | -29.5% |
| 19 | Kalingaleri | 468 | 330 | -29.5% |
| 20 | Erukambattu | 248 | 175 | -29.4% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
3 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
3 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.