Biggest population changes in Tuticorin district
Computed from 297 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Tuticorin district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Melapandiyapuram | 766 | 1,911 | +149.5% |
| 2 | Perurani | 1,764 | 4,338 | +145.9% |
| 3 | Suraikkaipatti | 683 | 1,624 | +137.8% |
| 4 | Kurumalai | 974 | 2,298 | +135.9% |
| 5 | Kattalampatti | 512 | 1,190 | +132.4% |
| 6 | Sivagnanapuram | 1,439 | 3,123 | +117.0% |
| 7 | Mela Arasadi | 1,841 | 3,875 | +110.5% |
| 8 | P.Jagaveerapuram | 281 | 557 | +98.2% |
| 9 | Malaipatti | 1,427 | 2,798 | +96.1% |
| 10 | Vadakku Vandanam | 491 | 953 | +94.1% |
| 11 | KilpidagaiAppankovil | 875 | 1,627 | +85.9% |
| 12 | Kaliyavur | 2,378 | 4,350 | +82.9% |
| 13 | S.Kumarapuram | 1,647 | 2,995 | +81.8% |
| 14 | Irachi | 3,266 | 5,914 | +81.1% |
| 15 | Sundarapatchiapuram | 251 | 451 | +79.7% |
| 16 | Therku Mylodai | 2,807 | 5,000 | +78.1% |
| 17 | Kottanatham | 539 | 955 | +77.2% |
| 18 | Vahaivilai | 447 | 790 | +76.7% |
| 19 | Nanalkadu | 619 | 1,086 | +75.4% |
| 20 | Usilankulam | 915 | 1,601 | +75.0% |
Villages that shrank most in Tuticorin district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kila Mudiman | 2,073 | 1,271 | -38.7% |
| 2 | Udangudi | 1,239 | 765 | -38.3% |
| 3 | Ayan Karisalkulam | 2,286 | 1,423 | -37.8% |
| 4 | Ettilappanaickenpatti | 1,146 | 720 | -37.2% |
| 5 | Duraiyoor | 2,186 | 1,406 | -35.7% |
| 6 | Padukkapathu | 7,425 | 4,782 | -35.6% |
| 7 | Kottarakkurichi | 3,858 | 2,486 | -35.6% |
| 8 | Kalugachalapuram | 633 | 412 | -34.9% |
| 9 | Pudukulam | 6,674 | 4,692 | -29.7% |
| 10 | Sivagnanapuram | 1,509 | 1,063 | -29.6% |
| 11 | Panasuraettunaickenpatti | 254 | 180 | -29.1% |
| 12 | Idaiseval | 3,024 | 2,155 | -28.7% |
| 13 | Lakshmipuram | 1,104 | 790 | -28.4% |
| 14 | Semmarikulam | 5,859 | 4,200 | -28.3% |
| 15 | Chithavanaickenpatti | 2,414 | 1,748 | -27.6% |
| 16 | Palangulam | 5,616 | 4,128 | -26.5% |
| 17 | Sevalapperi | 1,511 | 1,112 | -26.4% |
| 18 | Cherakulam | 4,837 | 3,570 | -26.2% |
| 19 | Korkai | 3,986 | 2,954 | -25.9% |
| 20 | Kulathur (North) | 2,981 | 2,218 | -25.6% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
1 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.