Tiruchuli block
Virudhunagar district, Tamil Nadu · 100 villages
Villages
100
Average change
+14.4%
across 56 measurable villages
Population 2011 → 2020
58,096 → 66,371
compared villages only
Villages in this block
| Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aladipatti | 2,811 | 2,776 | -1.3% |
| Ambaneri | 260 | 290 | +11.5% |
| Anikalakkiyendal | 154 | — | not measured |
| Anjanaikkuthi | — | — | — |
| Bommakottai | 815 | 855 | +4.9% |
| Chettikulam | 1,992 | 3,684 | +84.9% |
| Chinnavannankulam | — | — | — |
| Chittalakundu | 1,132 | 1,236 | +9.2% |
| Erasinnampatti | 373 | 295 | -20.9% |
| Idaiyankulam | — | — | — |
| Iluppaikkulam | 406 | — | not measured |
| Kadaiyanendal | — | — | — |
| Kadalpatchi | — | — | — |
| Kadambankulam | — | — | — |
| Kalayarkarisalkulam | 1,971 | 1,468 | -25.5% |
| Kallakkari | 377 | — | unreliable |
| Kallandal | — | — | — |
| Kallattikulam | 28 | 35 | +25.0% |
| Kallorani | 2,798 | 4,834 | +72.8% |
| Kallumadam | 1,934 | 1,485 | -23.2% |
| Kalyanasundarapuram | 240 | 210 | -12.5% |
| Kanakai | 1,417 | 1,240 | -12.5% |
| Karendal | 866 | 1,037 | +19.8% |
| Karuppukkattiyendal | — | — | — |
| Keelakandamangalam | 356 | 372 | +4.5% |
| Keelkudi | 1,264 | 1,191 | -5.8% |
| Kokkulam | 146 | 229 | +56.9% |
| Konappanendal | 618 | 617 | -0.2% |
| Konganakurichi | 575 | 714 | +24.2% |
| Kulasekaranallur | 2,820 | — | unreliable |
| Kullampatti | 855 | 976 | +14.2% |
| Kurunaikulam | 641 | 1,141 | +78.0% |
| Kurunjakkulam | — | — | — |
| Kutchampatti | 613 | 602 | -1.8% |
| Maili | 318 | 356 | +11.9% |
| Manavarayanendal | 371 | 317 | -14.6% |
| Mandapasalai | 4,691 | 5,207 | +11.0% |
| Mangulam | 310 | — | not measured |
| Maravarperungudi | 1,971 | 2,564 | +30.1% |
| Meenakshipuram | — | — | — |
| Melaiyur | 1,420 | — | not measured |
| Melakandamangalam | 2,111 | 2,898 | +37.3% |
| Melendal | 662 | 955 | +44.3% |
| Meludaikulam | 48 | 71 | +47.9% |
| Mithilaikulam | 571 | — | not measured |
| Muthanendal | — | — | — |
| Muthuramalingapuram | 1,591 | — | not measured |
| Nadakulam | 113 | 170 | +50.4% |
| Nallatharai | 587 | 621 | +5.8% |
| Narthampatti | 1,036 | — | not measured |
| Nathakkulam | — | — | — |
| Notchikkulam | 329 | 400 | +21.6% |
| Pallimadam | 605 | 884 | +46.1% |
| Pannaimoonadradaippu | 2,560 | — | unreliable |
| Paraikulam | 534 | 819 | +53.4% |
| Paraiyankulam | — | — | — |
| Paralachi | 1,432 | — | not measured |
| Parattanatham | 93 | 56 | -39.8% |
| Perumanendal | — | — | — |
| Pillaiyarthottaiyankulam | 1,586 | 1,570 | -1.0% |
| Poolangal | 3,909 | 3,927 | +0.5% |
| Pulikurichi | 1,089 | 930 | -14.6% |
| Puliyangulam | 1,165 | 1,279 | +9.8% |
| Pullanaickenpatti | 870 | 868 | -0.2% |
| Purasaloor | 1,663 | 1,998 | +20.1% |
| Puthiyendal | — | — | — |
| Rajagopalapuram | 919 | 844 | -8.2% |
| Salukkuvarpatti | 896 | 949 | +5.9% |
| Sappaniyendal | — | — | — |
| Savaspuram | 1,800 | — | not measured |
| Seeniendal | — | — | — |
| Semmanendal | — | — | — |
| Sengulam | 1,182 | 1,193 | +0.9% |
| Sennilakkudi | 1,114 | — | not measured |
| Silukkapatti | 516 | — | unreliable |
| Sirumudalaikulam | — | — | — |
| Soochaneri | 304 | — | unreliable |
| Sriramanendal | — | — | — |
| Sundakottai | — | — | — |
| Suthamadam | 1,161 | 1,778 | +53.1% |
| Thammanaickenpatti | 404 | 403 | -0.3% |
| Therkunatham | 668 | 498 | -25.4% |
| Thirumalaipuram | 617 | 666 | +7.9% |
| Thondamankulam | 20 | 32 | +60.0% |
| Thoppalakarai | 1,899 | 2,872 | +51.2% |
| Thummuchinnampatti | 2,469 | 2,450 | -0.8% |
| Tippampatti | — | — | — |
| Tiruchuli | 9,665 | — | unreliable |
| Udaiyananpatti | 681 | 646 | -5.1% |
| Udayarendal | 61 | 89 | +45.9% |
| Udichchiyendal | — | — | — |
| Uranippatti | 35 | — | unreliable |
| Vadakkunatham | 901 | 915 | +1.6% |
| Vadapalai | 391 | 284 | -27.4% |
| Valayanendal | — | — | — |
| Vallilaperi | — | — | — |
| Vedanatham | 681 | 682 | +0.1% |
| Velayuthapuram | 726 | 893 | +23.0% |
| Veppilaiseri | — | — | — |
| Vidathakulam | 862 | — | unreliable |
Blocks are the administrative tier between district and village. The block a village belongs to comes from the Local Government Directory via the 2020 survey, so it reflects boundaries as of 2020, not 2011.