Biggest population changes in Virudhunagar district
Computed from 329 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Virudhunagar district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Krishnaperi | 776 | 1,640 | +111.3% |
| 2 | Tadagannai Managaseri | 2,143 | 4,479 | +109.0% |
| 3 | T.Koppuchithampatti | 837 | 1,712 | +104.5% |
| 4 | Uthuppatti | 1,549 | 3,080 | +98.8% |
| 5 | Pampatti | 406 | 796 | +96.1% |
| 6 | Nallamanayakkanpatti | 425 | 815 | +91.8% |
| 7 | Vadakkusrivilliputhur | 2,157 | 4,130 | +91.5% |
| 8 | Melakumilankulam | 730 | 1,393 | +90.8% |
| 9 | Chettikulam | 1,992 | 3,684 | +84.9% |
| 10 | Sukkilanatham | 484 | 888 | +83.5% |
| 11 | Kalathur | 230 | 420 | +82.6% |
| 12 | Pandanendal | 452 | 820 | +81.4% |
| 13 | V.Nangoor | 621 | 1,126 | +81.3% |
| 14 | Ottankulam | 764 | 1,382 | +80.9% |
| 15 | Kurunaikulam | 641 | 1,141 | +78.0% |
| 16 | Govindanallur | 372 | 654 | +75.8% |
| 17 | Kattangudi | 1,608 | 2,804 | +74.4% |
| 18 | Kallorani | 2,798 | 4,834 | +72.8% |
| 19 | Sinduvampatti | 839 | 1,434 | +70.9% |
| 20 | Amathur (Part) | 781 | 1,326 | +69.8% |
Villages that shrank most in Virudhunagar district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kananjampatti | 3,791 | 2,294 | -39.5% |
| 2 | Theli | 1,942 | 1,180 | -39.2% |
| 3 | Ammapatti | 2,516 | 1,541 | -38.8% |
| 4 | Varisaiyur | 751 | 460 | -38.8% |
| 5 | Vadakkupuliampatti | 2,051 | 1,261 | -38.5% |
| 6 | Kuraiyaravasithan | 706 | 438 | -38.0% |
| 7 | Karaikulam | 293 | 186 | -36.5% |
| 8 | Gopalapuram | 1,461 | 937 | -35.9% |
| 9 | Villipathiri | 3,806 | 2,451 | -35.6% |
| 10 | Anaiyur (Part) | 4,919 | 3,174 | -35.5% |
| 11 | Sathiseri | 850 | 550 | -35.3% |
| 12 | Malli | 5,839 | 3,834 | -34.3% |
| 13 | Eluvani | 1,293 | 855 | -33.9% |
| 14 | Andiyendal | 739 | 490 | -33.7% |
| 15 | Kambikudi | 3,640 | 2,472 | -32.1% |
| 16 | Mangalam | 7,105 | 4,850 | -31.7% |
| 17 | Perayyampatti | 1,113 | 768 | -31.0% |
| 18 | Manankathan | 571 | 394 | -31.0% |
| 19 | Golwarpatti | 2,667 | 1,864 | -30.1% |
| 20 | Lakshmipuram | 5,610 | 3,958 | -29.4% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
5 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
5 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.