Biggest population changes in Jagitial district
Computed from 102 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Jagitial district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tippannapet | 2,783 | 4,504 | +61.8% |
| 2 | Sangem | 575 | 911 | +58.4% |
| 3 | Chelgal | 4,986 | 6,992 | +40.2% |
| 4 | Dharur | 2,711 | 3,687 | +36.0% |
| 5 | Dabba | 2,548 | 3,250 | +27.6% |
| 6 | Kondapur | 1,147 | 1,450 | +26.4% |
| 7 | Ambaripet | 2,424 | 2,912 | +20.1% |
| 8 | Sankenapalle | 551 | 657 | +19.2% |
| 9 | Suraram | 467 | 554 | +18.6% |
| 10 | Dharmaram | 1,783 | 2,109 | +18.3% |
| 11 | Thombarao Peta | 1,402 | 1,650 | +17.7% |
| 12 | Kondapur | 2,102 | 2,471 | +17.6% |
| 13 | Ramalachakkapet | 1,520 | 1,778 | +17.0% |
| 14 | Sanivarampeta | 419 | 489 | +16.7% |
| 15 | Bonkur | 1,297 | 1,510 | +16.4% |
| 16 | Chintalur | 828 | 963 | +16.3% |
| 17 | Fakir Kondapur | 704 | 795 | +12.9% |
| 18 | Metlachittapur | 1,975 | 2,199 | +11.3% |
| 19 | Thippaipalle | 2,091 | 2,302 | +10.1% |
| 20 | Godur | 4,039 | 4,442 | +10.0% |
Villages that shrank most in Jagitial district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alur | 2,104 | 1,279 | -39.2% |
| 2 | Bornapalle | 1,890 | 1,151 | -39.1% |
| 3 | Namilikonda | 4,436 | 2,712 | -38.9% |
| 4 | Damarajapalli | 3,316 | 2,031 | -38.8% |
| 5 | Nancherla | 4,614 | 2,889 | -37.4% |
| 6 | Thirmalapur | 2,812 | 1,782 | -36.6% |
| 7 | Somanpalli | 1,767 | 1,120 | -36.6% |
| 8 | Kondrikarla | 3,198 | 2,053 | -35.8% |
| 9 | Kallur | 1,944 | 1,265 | -34.9% |
| 10 | Atmakur | 5,102 | 3,324 | -34.9% |
| 11 | Thalladharmaram | 1,510 | 990 | -34.4% |
| 12 | Bheemaram | 3,574 | 2,345 | -34.4% |
| 13 | Kamalapur | 3,038 | 2,000 | -34.2% |
| 14 | Endapalli | 6,081 | 4,122 | -32.2% |
| 15 | Gullakota | 5,099 | 3,518 | -31.0% |
| 16 | Oddelingapur | 1,722 | 1,199 | -30.4% |
| 17 | Kandlapalli | 1,266 | 890 | -29.7% |
| 18 | Jagitial | 1,607 | 1,135 | -29.4% |
| 19 | Peddapur | 1,832 | 1,301 | -29.0% |
| 20 | Chegyam | 3,693 | 2,688 | -27.2% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 2 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
2 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.