Biggest population changes in Khammam district
Computed from 118 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Khammam district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yagna Narayanapuram | 973 | 1,680 | +72.7% |
| 2 | Chennuru | 3,416 | 5,381 | +57.5% |
| 3 | Mallepally | 1,328 | 2,050 | +54.4% |
| 4 | Laxmidevipally | 605 | 905 | +49.6% |
| 5 | Gopalpeta | 885 | 1,305 | +47.5% |
| 6 | Maddulapally | 3,590 | 5,000 | +39.3% |
| 7 | Tondala Gopavaram | 290 | 400 | +37.9% |
| 8 | Gollagudem | 972 | 1,296 | +33.3% |
| 9 | Tirumalapuram | 527 | 697 | +32.3% |
| 10 | Cherukupalle | 948 | 1,243 | +31.1% |
| 11 | Nelakondapally | 7,767 | 9,816 | +26.4% |
| 12 | Gopaladeviboinapally | 1,111 | 1,400 | +26.0% |
| 13 | Kommenapally | 3,630 | 4,539 | +25.0% |
| 14 | Arekayalapadu | 903 | 1,106 | +22.5% |
| 15 | Pallegudem | 2,503 | 3,028 | +21.0% |
| 16 | Ramachandrapuram | 955 | 1,150 | +20.4% |
| 17 | Balapeta | 881 | 1,050 | +19.2% |
| 18 | Mustikuntla | 4,458 | 5,306 | +19.0% |
| 19 | Billupadu | 3,923 | 4,647 | +18.5% |
| 20 | Inagali | 1,968 | 2,310 | +17.4% |
Villages that shrank most in Khammam district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thanagampadu | 2,249 | 1,368 | -39.2% |
| 2 | Kamalapuram | 1,582 | 969 | -38.8% |
| 3 | Chimmapudi | 4,135 | 2,551 | -38.3% |
| 4 | Kodavatimetta | 2,051 | 1,270 | -38.1% |
| 5 | Kuppenakuntla | 2,860 | 1,794 | -37.3% |
| 6 | Jasthipally | 3,821 | 2,414 | -36.8% |
| 7 | Erraboinapalli | 3,777 | 2,430 | -35.7% |
| 8 | Muttharam | 3,677 | 2,383 | -35.2% |
| 9 | Bachodu | 3,552 | 2,310 | -35.0% |
| 10 | Mucharam | 2,327 | 1,524 | -34.5% |
| 11 | Adasarlapadu | 4,689 | 3,079 | -34.3% |
| 12 | Pammi | 3,144 | 2,077 | -33.9% |
| 13 | Jujjularaopeta | 2,955 | 1,958 | -33.7% |
| 14 | Edulla Cheruvu | 1,575 | 1,048 | -33.5% |
| 15 | Vishwanadhapally | 3,118 | 2,084 | -33.2% |
| 16 | Bodulabanda | 4,575 | 3,081 | -32.7% |
| 17 | Mathikepally | 3,119 | 2,129 | -31.7% |
| 18 | Singaraipalem | 3,905 | 2,670 | -31.6% |
| 19 | Koya Chalka | 2,279 | 1,567 | -31.2% |
| 20 | Nagula Vancha | 6,767 | 4,654 | -31.2% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
0 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.