Biggest population changes in Mahabubabad district
Computed from 114 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Mahabubabad district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Durgaram | 321 | 718 | +123.7% |
| 2 | Gurralakunta | 374 | 757 | +102.4% |
| 3 | Gundrapalle | 397 | 718 | +80.9% |
| 4 | Zamisthanpur | 437 | 776 | +77.6% |
| 5 | Mylaram | 391 | 682 | +74.4% |
| 6 | Murraigudem | 258 | 425 | +64.7% |
| 7 | Bathulapalle | 580 | 931 | +60.5% |
| 8 | Dubbaguda | 328 | 496 | +51.2% |
| 9 | Ayodhyapur | 1,273 | 1,850 | +45.3% |
| 10 | Bothavaniguda | 174 | 251 | +44.3% |
| 11 | Kachanapalle | 913 | 1,202 | +31.6% |
| 12 | Ponugundla | 549 | 717 | +30.6% |
| 13 | Rangapuram | 1,398 | 1,813 | +29.7% |
| 14 | Gunnepalle | 1,653 | 2,130 | +28.9% |
| 15 | Motlathimma Puram | 441 | 568 | +28.8% |
| 16 | Chikataipalem | 2,094 | 2,630 | +25.6% |
| 17 | Ramachandra Puram | 1,724 | 2,129 | +23.5% |
| 18 | Gopalapuram | 2,349 | 2,849 | +21.3% |
| 19 | Ootla | 751 | 893 | +18.9% |
| 20 | Pandem | 266 | 313 | +17.7% |
Villages that shrank most in Mahabubabad district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jayapuram | 2,841 | 1,744 | -38.6% |
| 2 | Ravigudem | 1,915 | 1,197 | -37.5% |
| 3 | Govindapur | 1,505 | 953 | -36.7% |
| 4 | Galivarigudem | 1,551 | 989 | -36.2% |
| 5 | Balapala | 3,802 | 2,436 | -35.9% |
| 6 | Boddugonda | 2,421 | 1,553 | -35.9% |
| 7 | Kommulavancha | 3,233 | 2,079 | -35.7% |
| 8 | Chinnavangara | 3,380 | 2,183 | -35.4% |
| 9 | Penugonda | 5,130 | 3,319 | -35.3% |
| 10 | Erjerla | 2,871 | 1,868 | -34.9% |
| 11 | Reddial | 4,239 | 2,760 | -34.9% |
| 12 | Chinthapalle | 3,196 | 2,081 | -34.9% |
| 13 | Singaram | 1,612 | 1,062 | -34.1% |
| 14 | Sudanpalle | 2,840 | 1,873 | -34.0% |
| 15 | Ootai | 2,543 | 1,683 | -33.8% |
| 16 | Shingaram | 1,876 | 1,264 | -32.6% |
| 17 | Irsulapuram | 3,067 | 2,074 | -32.4% |
| 18 | Nallela | 2,928 | 2,014 | -31.2% |
| 19 | Thattupalle | 2,318 | 1,610 | -30.5% |
| 20 | Inugurthy | 8,915 | 6,324 | -29.1% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
1 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
2 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.