Biggest population changes in Mancherial district
Computed from 129 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Mancherial district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yerraipet | 162 | 330 | +103.7% |
| 2 | Gadhpur | 816 | 1,577 | +93.3% |
| 3 | Dongapalle | 194 | 365 | +88.1% |
| 4 | Jangalpet | 766 | 1,387 | +81.1% |
| 5 | Rajaram | 646 | 1,126 | +74.3% |
| 6 | Puttiguda | 380 | 650 | +71.0% |
| 7 | Chinavenkatapur | 505 | 777 | +53.9% |
| 8 | Gollaghat | 517 | 788 | +52.4% |
| 9 | Kankalapur | 317 | 479 | +51.1% |
| 10 | Rangapet | 406 | 608 | +49.8% |
| 11 | Nagepalle | 147 | 220 | +49.7% |
| 12 | Gopalnagar | 479 | 701 | +46.4% |
| 13 | Reddipalle | 549 | 783 | +42.6% |
| 14 | Maddikunta | 1,120 | 1,571 | +40.3% |
| 15 | Kannal (R) | 938 | 1,300 | +38.6% |
| 16 | Allipur | 603 | 824 | +36.6% |
| 17 | Velganoor | 2,043 | 2,763 | +35.2% |
| 18 | Thangallapalle | 208 | 280 | +34.6% |
| 19 | Gurvapur | 225 | 302 | +34.2% |
| 20 | Baddampalle | 286 | 378 | +32.2% |
Villages that shrank most in Mancherial district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bikkanguda | 461 | 280 | -39.3% |
| 2 | Subbapalle | 3,793 | 2,332 | -38.5% |
| 3 | Chandrapalle | 582 | 360 | -38.1% |
| 4 | Dugnepalle | 2,913 | 1,805 | -38.0% |
| 5 | Pothepalle | 1,700 | 1,054 | -38.0% |
| 6 | Ponnaram | 2,358 | 1,506 | -36.1% |
| 7 | Avadam | 2,287 | 1,483 | -35.2% |
| 8 | Maddikal | 1,867 | 1,211 | -35.1% |
| 9 | Kawal | 2,808 | 1,822 | -35.1% |
| 10 | Kamanpalle | 1,865 | 1,211 | -35.1% |
| 11 | Singaraipet | 2,834 | 1,842 | -35.0% |
| 12 | Metpalle | 1,353 | 894 | -33.9% |
| 13 | Chandram | 2,904 | 1,956 | -32.6% |
| 14 | Jaipur | 2,492 | 1,679 | -32.6% |
| 15 | Rapanpalle | 1,424 | 1,000 | -29.8% |
| 16 | Dammireddipet | 227 | 160 | -29.5% |
| 17 | Sarangapalle | 1,733 | 1,222 | -29.5% |
| 18 | Yellakkapet | 1,466 | 1,042 | -28.9% |
| 19 | Donabanda | 3,218 | 2,319 | -27.9% |
| 20 | Pothanpalle | 349 | 252 | -27.8% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
4 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
4 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.