Biggest population changes in Nagarkurnool district
Computed from 111 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Nagarkurnool district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anekhanpalle | 395 | 857 | +117.0% |
| 2 | Dharmapur | 675 | 1,389 | +105.8% |
| 3 | Allipur | 714 | 1,389 | +94.5% |
| 4 | Kamalapur | 303 | 583 | +92.4% |
| 5 | Koneduvada | 482 | 916 | +90.0% |
| 6 | Venkatapur (Patti Godal) | 634 | 1,144 | +80.4% |
| 7 | Manajipet | 329 | 500 | +52.0% |
| 8 | Mahadevpur | 994 | 1,420 | +42.9% |
| 9 | Chinnamudnur | 1,135 | 1,600 | +41.0% |
| 10 | Vallabhapur | 874 | 1,203 | +37.6% |
| 11 | Bonala | 2,462 | 3,363 | +36.6% |
| 12 | Ummapur | 809 | 1,069 | +32.1% |
| 13 | Gattunellikuduru | 1,335 | 1,660 | +24.3% |
| 14 | Surapur | 1,768 | 2,184 | +23.5% |
| 15 | Ramajipalle | 1,825 | 2,174 | +19.1% |
| 16 | Brahmanapalle | 694 | 822 | +18.4% |
| 17 | Lakshmapur (P.N) | 1,536 | 1,800 | +17.2% |
| 18 | Govindayapalle | 1,130 | 1,322 | +17.0% |
| 19 | Paspula | 2,147 | 2,507 | +16.8% |
| 20 | Puljal | 1,139 | 1,320 | +15.9% |
Villages that shrank most in Nagarkurnool district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rachur | 2,615 | 1,600 | -38.8% |
| 2 | Kondareddipalle | 1,329 | 824 | -38.0% |
| 3 | Bajipuram | 1,642 | 1,043 | -36.5% |
| 4 | Narlapuram | 2,652 | 1,740 | -34.4% |
| 5 | Charakonda | 7,201 | 4,776 | -33.7% |
| 6 | Nizamabad | 909 | 607 | -33.2% |
| 7 | Rangapur | 4,752 | 3,209 | -32.5% |
| 8 | Avancha | 5,022 | 3,395 | -32.4% |
| 9 | Akkavaram | 1,745 | 1,180 | -32.4% |
| 10 | Thimmaipalle | 1,754 | 1,190 | -32.2% |
| 11 | Bollampalle | 2,318 | 1,574 | -32.1% |
| 12 | Gangaram | 5,722 | 3,900 | -31.8% |
| 13 | Polkampalle | 3,824 | 2,625 | -31.4% |
| 14 | Marikal | 3,096 | 2,137 | -31.0% |
| 15 | Jupalle | 3,664 | 2,559 | -30.2% |
| 16 | Bommenapalle | 3,816 | 2,680 | -29.8% |
| 17 | Gouraram | 1,616 | 1,140 | -29.5% |
| 18 | Marepalle | 3,479 | 2,471 | -29.0% |
| 19 | Ghanapur | 1,931 | 1,373 | -28.9% |
| 20 | Panjugul | 3,279 | 2,333 | -28.9% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
0 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.