Biggest population changes in Ranga Reddy district
Computed from 175 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Ranga Reddy district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Abdullapur | 5,226 | 11,632 | +122.6% |
| 2 | Dilwarguda | 290 | 542 | +86.9% |
| 3 | Polaram | 425 | 765 | +80.0% |
| 4 | Asmatpur | 674 | 1,143 | +69.6% |
| 5 | Manthangoud | 553 | 893 | +61.5% |
| 6 | Rasheedguda | 481 | 771 | +60.3% |
| 7 | Muchintal | 1,772 | 2,700 | +52.4% |
| 8 | Golkonda Khurd | 1,306 | 1,981 | +51.7% |
| 9 | Turkaguda | 880 | 1,286 | +46.1% |
| 10 | Pocharam | 1,598 | 2,326 | +45.6% |
| 11 | Kondurg(West) | 4,483 | 6,509 | +45.2% |
| 12 | Pothugal | 1,253 | 1,800 | +43.7% |
| 13 | Kulkulpalle | 3,409 | 4,735 | +38.9% |
| 14 | Parveda Khalsa | 2,015 | 2,760 | +37.0% |
| 15 | Jaithwaram (Khalsa) | 1,186 | 1,578 | +33.0% |
| 16 | Laskerguda | 1,361 | 1,795 | +31.9% |
| 17 | Rudraram | 1,046 | 1,370 | +31.0% |
| 18 | Ravulapalle (Khurd) | 954 | 1,236 | +29.6% |
| 19 | Kummera | 935 | 1,210 | +29.4% |
| 20 | Dearlapalle | 705 | 902 | +27.9% |
Villages that shrank most in Ranga Reddy district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lemoor | 4,828 | 2,929 | -39.3% |
| 2 | Gungal | 4,254 | 2,589 | -39.1% |
| 3 | Gudur | 2,765 | 1,692 | -38.8% |
| 4 | Pulumamidi | 2,967 | 1,821 | -38.6% |
| 5 | Bhairkhanpalle | 1,066 | 657 | -38.4% |
| 6 | Yadavalli | 1,374 | 850 | -38.1% |
| 7 | Mucherla | 4,147 | 2,576 | -37.9% |
| 8 | Polepalle | 1,960 | 1,237 | -36.9% |
| 9 | Ummenthyal | 1,917 | 1,226 | -36.0% |
| 10 | Santhapur | 2,177 | 1,395 | -35.9% |
| 11 | Cherukupalle | 1,686 | 1,096 | -35.0% |
| 12 | Chukkapur | 2,886 | 1,886 | -34.6% |
| 13 | Regadidoswada | 1,892 | 1,240 | -34.5% |
| 14 | Golkonda Kalan | 1,982 | 1,306 | -34.1% |
| 15 | Chilkamarri (Chelka) | 1,680 | 1,109 | -34.0% |
| 16 | Kandukur | 4,999 | 3,356 | -32.9% |
| 17 | Arkapalle | 3,985 | 2,677 | -32.8% |
| 18 | Agiryal | 2,192 | 1,473 | -32.8% |
| 19 | Alwal | 2,595 | 1,764 | -32.0% |
| 20 | Tummalapalle | 2,236 | 1,523 | -31.9% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
2 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
2 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.