Biggest population changes in Sangareddy district
Computed from 160 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Sangareddy district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Turkal Khanapur | 715 | 1,615 | +125.9% |
| 2 | Chetlapotharam | 1,645 | 3,687 | +124.1% |
| 3 | Koulampet | 1,498 | 3,280 | +119.0% |
| 4 | Kodakanchi | 1,049 | 2,127 | +102.8% |
| 5 | Khazipalle | 1,813 | 3,626 | +100.0% |
| 6 | Lingampalle | 754 | 1,500 | +98.9% |
| 7 | Mudimanikyam | 3,146 | 5,600 | +78.0% |
| 8 | Allapur | 396 | 695 | +75.5% |
| 9 | Royyapalle | 603 | 1,030 | +70.8% |
| 10 | Goudgaon [K] | 544 | 877 | +61.2% |
| 11 | Beloor | 370 | 590 | +59.5% |
| 12 | Ibrahimpur | 1,223 | 1,808 | +47.8% |
| 13 | Magdumpur | 426 | 613 | +43.9% |
| 14 | Akwanchaguda | 226 | 320 | +41.6% |
| 15 | Buchnelli (Part) | 1,539 | 2,170 | +41.0% |
| 16 | Raipalle [ P.D.] | 1,120 | 1,564 | +39.6% |
| 17 | Mahbathpur | 613 | 854 | +39.3% |
| 18 | Yerraram | 1,140 | 1,550 | +36.0% |
| 19 | Khammampalle | 2,156 | 2,880 | +33.6% |
| 20 | Raipahad | 671 | 892 | +32.9% |
Villages that shrank most in Sangareddy district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chintalcheru | 3,861 | 2,429 | -37.1% |
| 2 | Ryakal | 4,841 | 3,080 | -36.4% |
| 3 | Usrikpalle | 1,482 | 951 | -35.8% |
| 4 | Karsgutti | 3,465 | 2,247 | -35.1% |
| 5 | Chaptakhadeem | 4,267 | 2,777 | -34.9% |
| 6 | Masan Palle | 2,543 | 1,659 | -34.8% |
| 7 | Bachepalle | 3,617 | 2,373 | -34.4% |
| 8 | Anegunta | 2,502 | 1,651 | -34.0% |
| 9 | Haridaspur | 1,231 | 816 | -33.7% |
| 10 | Kankunta | 5,091 | 3,398 | -33.3% |
| 11 | Meerkhanpet | 1,649 | 1,108 | -32.8% |
| 12 | Mansanpally | 1,198 | 820 | -31.6% |
| 13 | Gajulpahad | 1,845 | 1,290 | -30.1% |
| 14 | Borgi Aurad | 2,383 | 1,674 | -29.8% |
| 15 | Erdanoor | 2,346 | 1,653 | -29.5% |
| 16 | Vailal | 2,167 | 1,535 | -29.2% |
| 17 | Hangarga [K] | 2,221 | 1,585 | -28.6% |
| 18 | Abenda | 4,228 | 3,029 | -28.4% |
| 19 | Ramreddi Pet | 1,978 | 1,422 | -28.1% |
| 20 | Turkwadgaon | 3,507 | 2,548 | -27.4% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
0 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.